>>60828787
cause is specific illegal or (per job appointment/employment contract) conduct breaching that contract
its the same reason why you cant fire an employee just for being a nigger, they havr to have demonstrated specific malfeasance or ineptitude on the job
>>60828828
>>60828842
if powell stays as governor (which i doubt for the reasons you listed), then he would definitely challenge it. and no, scotus has already ruled (in the same ruling where they said the president has the latitude to fire basically any appointee) that he specifically does NOT have that power over the fed