>>510726389 >Should sexbots and sexual AI be banned?
No, they WILL be banned. 100%. If all women vote to ban them and a tiny percentage of men also vote to ban them in order to please women, then it's inevitable to happen. That's democracy for you, chuds.
>>510559972 >>510560082
It's weak low-testosterone white men who would rather jerk off to digital abominations for decades than have sex in real life with a real woman. All niggers do to be more successful than you is TRY. That's literally it.