4chan Search
4 results for "a725afac820bf1b0a80bdab7f60c5a27"
>game starts talking about racism
>>150572180
>you miss out on the playoffs AND get a shitty low draft pick
Nigger I just gave you a extensive list of MVP-caliber players at the most important position who were drafted low, sometimes not even in the first round, and another list of players drafted as high as possible who are underwhelming and on losing teams. Draft position is incredibly overrated.
When's the last time the Chiefs had a top three pick? Or the Eagles? Or the Ravens? Or the Bills? Or the Niners? The Jags have had a lot of high draft picks. I guess they're really good now, right? The Browns picked at the top of the draft for like a fucking decade. Must have produced a dynasty, huh? None of the best teams were built by being shit for years and none of the teams that picked high the past few years are successful. It's not as simple as "higher picks = better players."
See, the thing is, bottoming out like that harms your fucking team across the board. No good coach wants to 1-16, even if they get to keep their job. No good GM wants to waste a season and get shit on for building a dumpster fire. No players want to take weekly beatings just to spin their wheels. If you're planning on bottoming out your either have to purge whatever talent you do have or watch people bail as things go to shit. The players and coaches won't just roll over. You have to put together a legitimately bad team and organization to finish dead last. And Bad organizations have a habit of staying bad. Again, look at the Browns. Look at the Jaguars. look at the Jets. Even the Bengals, who thought they had something only a few years ago. They couldn't seize the opportunities they had because they didn't have good coaches or scouts or cap specialists, etc. And they didn't have those things because the best people don't want to work for shit teams. A badly run team getting an A+ prospect is just a waste most of the time. Ask Trevor Lawrence. Ask Baker Mayfield. You don't get good by being shit
>you miss out on the playoffs AND get a shitty low draft pick
Nigger I just gave you a extensive list of MVP-caliber players at the most important position who were drafted low, sometimes not even in the first round, and another list of players drafted as high as possible who are underwhelming and on losing teams. Draft position is incredibly overrated.
When's the last time the Chiefs had a top three pick? Or the Eagles? Or the Ravens? Or the Bills? Or the Niners? The Jags have had a lot of high draft picks. I guess they're really good now, right? The Browns picked at the top of the draft for like a fucking decade. Must have produced a dynasty, huh? None of the best teams were built by being shit for years and none of the teams that picked high the past few years are successful. It's not as simple as "higher picks = better players."
See, the thing is, bottoming out like that harms your fucking team across the board. No good coach wants to 1-16, even if they get to keep their job. No good GM wants to waste a season and get shit on for building a dumpster fire. No players want to take weekly beatings just to spin their wheels. If you're planning on bottoming out your either have to purge whatever talent you do have or watch people bail as things go to shit. The players and coaches won't just roll over. You have to put together a legitimately bad team and organization to finish dead last. And Bad organizations have a habit of staying bad. Again, look at the Browns. Look at the Jaguars. look at the Jets. Even the Bengals, who thought they had something only a few years ago. They couldn't seize the opportunities they had because they didn't have good coaches or scouts or cap specialists, etc. And they didn't have those things because the best people don't want to work for shit teams. A badly run team getting an A+ prospect is just a waste most of the time. Ask Trevor Lawrence. Ask Baker Mayfield. You don't get good by being shit
>>213759669
All they had to do was look at the John Byrne run and do that. Was he an unrepentant coomer who sexualized She-Hulk? Yes, and that's what the fans wanted. Instead they catered to feminists like the fanbase wasn't 90% horny, immature men.
It's like if McDonald's decided to start fat shaming people, refused to sell anything but salads and then wondered why sales suddenly took a dive. You gotta know which side your bread is buttered on
All they had to do was look at the John Byrne run and do that. Was he an unrepentant coomer who sexualized She-Hulk? Yes, and that's what the fans wanted. Instead they catered to feminists like the fanbase wasn't 90% horny, immature men.
It's like if McDonald's decided to start fat shaming people, refused to sell anything but salads and then wondered why sales suddenly took a dive. You gotta know which side your bread is buttered on
>>211976732
$900 mil in 2016 money is somewhere around 1.1-1.2 bil in today's money depending on which inflation calculator you want to use. Brave new world has a worldwide gross of $415 mil and Thunderbolts has $382. BVS made more than those two films COMBINED.
So no, they're not successes and BVS is, because they made less than half as much as it did. People grossly underestimate how much BVS actually made because they act like any number under a billion is interchangeable. But $900 mil (again, in 2016 dollars) is a LOT more than $400 mil in 2025 dollars. Snyder's supposed huge failure was not a failure. It just got reported as such, in the same magazines and websites that shill every MCU film. Which are all owned by Disney. Try thinking for yourself for once
$900 mil in 2016 money is somewhere around 1.1-1.2 bil in today's money depending on which inflation calculator you want to use. Brave new world has a worldwide gross of $415 mil and Thunderbolts has $382. BVS made more than those two films COMBINED.
So no, they're not successes and BVS is, because they made less than half as much as it did. People grossly underestimate how much BVS actually made because they act like any number under a billion is interchangeable. But $900 mil (again, in 2016 dollars) is a LOT more than $400 mil in 2025 dollars. Snyder's supposed huge failure was not a failure. It just got reported as such, in the same magazines and websites that shill every MCU film. Which are all owned by Disney. Try thinking for yourself for once