4chan Search
7 results for "a7631b579cc98f07113d11f2cb3d5b6d"
>Tempted to craft 3x Fennie since its the only deck I don't have
What were they thinking with Gildaria?
>Rally so it can super evo for free
>Summons two knights that have rush
>Strong ability that makes barrier useless and makes clearing boards easy
>Knights can be summoned with a normal evo so she can be a good turn 6 play
Like what will the next pushed sword legendary even look like?
>Rally so it can super evo for free
>Summons two knights that have rush
>Strong ability that makes barrier useless and makes clearing boards easy
>Knights can be summoned with a normal evo so she can be a good turn 6 play
Like what will the next pushed sword legendary even look like?
>Only way to play Wilbert without him instantly getting removed with Odin is to use bonus energy to get him out before Odin drops
>Haven finally gets a legendary that vomits out stats like most of the other crafts
>Instantly becomes S tier
So now only forest is the one with no legendary that vomits out stats
>Instantly becomes S tier
So now only forest is the one with no legendary that vomits out stats
>>531308992
>Earth rite 1
Why even have an earthrite cost that low? every spell rune deck is running soup already so they can pay his earthrite cost with no issues
>Earth rite 1
Why even have an earthrite cost that low? every spell rune deck is running soup already so they can pay his earthrite cost with no issues
>>715241046
>release game
>its plain bad or didnt deliver what was promised
>people who paid money for it leave a review accordingly
>OH NO ITS HECKING REVIEW BOMBING
Where the fuck did this come from? Most people seem to use the term "review bombing" to deflect valid criticism, making it sound like its some form of botting and it isnt actually VALID criticism but just some troll attempt or harassing campaign or something. Look at fucking MH Wilds, with is a terrible game all around and even IF you liked it if it comes to gameplay, its so insanely bad optimized that it still fully deserves the pathetic reviews it got. Yet a lot of people consider it "review bombed"
>release game
>its plain bad or didnt deliver what was promised
>people who paid money for it leave a review accordingly
>OH NO ITS HECKING REVIEW BOMBING
Where the fuck did this come from? Most people seem to use the term "review bombing" to deflect valid criticism, making it sound like its some form of botting and it isnt actually VALID criticism but just some troll attempt or harassing campaign or something. Look at fucking MH Wilds, with is a terrible game all around and even IF you liked it if it comes to gameplay, its so insanely bad optimized that it still fully deserves the pathetic reviews it got. Yet a lot of people consider it "review bombed"
>>714396559
>nintendo is SUPER aggressive if you even copy a single pixel or note of one of their works and sue you into bankruptcy
>most of their old soundtracks are BLATANT bootlegs like what OP just posted
Its always amazing how Nintendo gets away with everything they do no matter what it is. They could start banning Switch 2 consoles because you used aftermarket controllers on them and people would probably defend it.
>nintendo is SUPER aggressive if you even copy a single pixel or note of one of their works and sue you into bankruptcy
>most of their old soundtracks are BLATANT bootlegs like what OP just posted
Its always amazing how Nintendo gets away with everything they do no matter what it is. They could start banning Switch 2 consoles because you used aftermarket controllers on them and people would probably defend it.