>>513587525
Man, I've detailed this entire argument and I'll even cite case law because I'm tired of bickering incels defending this shit.
United States v. Florence: The U.S. Department of Justice has publicized the case of James Florence Jr., a man sentenced to nine years in prison in July 2025 for cyberstalking over a 16-year period. According to court filings, he engaged in "elaborate online harassment campaigns" that included posting digitally altered, sexually explicit images of his victims and publishing their personal information. This case is a strong example of how federal cyberstalking laws are used to prosecute those who use intimate images to harass others.
United States v. Latigo: Another relevant case is Heriberto Latigo, who was convicted under federal cyberstalking statutes for using nude photos of his ex-girlfriend to coerce her. This case, publicized by the FBI, highlights how the use of intimate images can be a key component of a cyberstalking crime.
United States v. Martin: In a similar case, Troy Allen Martin was convicted for blackmailing a victim using nude photos. These cases show how the use of intimate images in a harassing or coercive context can meet the legal requirements for a federal crime.
Most established fucking shit and children want to argue with a literal law student and tell me that he is wrong. I go to cornell faggots what do you do besides shitpost on 4chan? hang yourselves.