>>717373020
>Why bother with all the licensed content (and pay more for it) when Nintendo's brands are doing perfectly fine on their own and Mario being on the cover is good enough?
to not create a serious competitor to smash like in the scenario in the op

>>213395027
>so we never find out what happened to them
you do realize, nvm...

>>212692983
>impossible to avoid
>americans literally cannot imagine not drinking mass produced soft drink slop

So what you're saying is, Millenials will rule for 1000 years, and it will be a prosperous period?

Will hipster chic be the choice of fashion for gods chosen during the 1000 years? And are millenials actually the real jews?

>it's been set back by years
next week
>they're 2 weeks away