>>508201968
that doesn't work. each detonation is less effective than the last due to backfill which absorbs more energy and also conceals the original target point.

>>507997212
Thank you for actually looking at the page I posted unlike all the other anons who think "just nuke it" will work. This situation is actually pretty interesting because the US and Jizzrael want to pretend they have the capability, and the media has been running stories about bunker busters, but in reality they don't have the ability. Successive detonations are probably counter productive as loose fallback material absorbs more energy than solid rock.