>>127464657
Oh?

>>938653821
lel

>>23127391
It's ironic that they complain bitterly about the male gaze while also catering to it, isn't it? If men didn't gaze, they wouldn't have rights, would they?

>>127407648
>>127407671
>>127407782
>>127407906
>>127407983
>>127408012
>>127417832
Maggie > all these worthless thots

Is there any form of media, be it movies, games or music, that you can appreciate despite its creators being diametrically opposed to your deep-seated beliefs? Do the creators' contrary beliefs filter into their work? Do you feel dissonance or are you able to compartmentalize your own rejection of their work just to appreciate its merits?

Me: Maggie Rogers. On the surface, she embodies everything I loathe about modern female Pop. She's a progressive poster child who stumps for the Democratic Party, cites feminist theory like scripture and serenades a liberal middle class audience hellbent on transforming America into a political monoculture. My inner Carl Schmitt demands the friend/enemy distinction, but I sheath my sword for her. Beneath the activism lies something rarer than ideological alignment: raw humanity.

Surrender sounds like a private journal blasted through stadium-sized hooks. Energetic and upbeat songs like "Shatter", "Want Want" and "Overdrive" hit with fuzzed adrenaline while "Be Cool" exhales into groove-cooled calm. Other songs like "Anywhere With You" and "Begging for Rain" drip with melancholy without being maudlin. Nothing stagnates; even the quiet tracks stay in motion.

Maggie's resonant purity inspires building futures or collapsing into into the arms of someone who loves you after a brutal day. All told, it may be the most unapologetically human album ever to breach the radio.

>>512771304
It's called a mom bod.

>>512743592
She's part German and Irish, if I recall.