>>513601070
>>513600130
you are both irredeemable spergs, which is par for the course here
the point of the chinese room thought experiment is this:
by locking the man in the room and providing him with input in a language he doesn't know, Searle has cleverly removed human intelligence from the experiment. It could be a trained pigeon in there and the room would still "know Chinese". It could be nothing in there
the point of this experiment is to demonstrate that language production does not necessitate intelligence
the room could be fully automated, just a machine, and to those outside it would seem that a person who speaks Chinese is in there
we have such a machine now, it's called an LLM
Searle's thought experiment is now a real experiment, and the result of it is that, indeed, language production performance is not enough to reliably distinguish between "human speaking Chinese" and "a judiciously-chosen pile of heuristics"
