>>713903419
>you can't tell the difference between decompiled code, compiled code, backend, server binaries and documentation describing the process.
It doesn't matter, it's all covered by copyright.
Right now you're just spewing whatever you can to sound legitimate instead of addressing the thing you should be which you clearly either don't understand or are just in denial about.
>in spite of Doom having its source code released years ago and neither Id nor Bethesda losing their copyright
See what I mean.
The source code for the game and the IP Doom are two entirely different things, not just one big thing unless you're suggesting that dark ages uses the original source code.
Here's a better example for you though, Nintendo owns Donkey Kong the property, the monkeys and all that, but the code for the original arcade game belonged to Ikegami Tsushinki and they attempted to sue Nintendo when they reverse engineered it for the sequels.
Are you starting to understand this a little better?
