>>24721489
why doesn't anyone understand hobbes?
I read him once when I was 16 and still understand him better than his acolytes on this board.
>a supreme being that determines right and wrong and truth itself
he never says this. it's a pragmatic philosophy and the justification for the sovereign is that in embracing the role society avoids all vs. all is based on universal morals like rape and murder and theft are bad
>The Ontological Principle is that there no truth if there is not a being.
again, you're wrong. i guess you skipped the optics chapters.
>How do we reconcile the fact that there is no truth independent of beings with materialism?
we don't have that problem and neither did hobbes

Meds, schizo.

>>24502063
>n