>>514981669
wow

u sure r upset

>>514086062
>LITERALLY BASED ON THE JEWISH BOOK,
yes, a "jewish book" where jews repeatedly admit how they sacrifice their own children to the demons they worship

best kike book ever

HAH

>>513823718
>Get off that judaizing scribe translations of the Bible and start reading the complete canon.

all of the translations, no matter which bible, make it VERY CLEAR what REALLY happened

>>513696096
>jew being canaanites
>this is debatable

LOL

SOMEBODIES' JIMMIES GETTIN' RUSTLED

>>513268610
>What translation?

they all agree on the important parts

>>513188026
>it's mistranslated
prove it

>>513188127
>Why has the USA been in decline since the exact founding of Israel in 1948?

jews

>>513064401
>stop killing children
>anti-semitism

been telling you niggers this for years

everything's coming together like a coupla buttcheeks

>>512819639
>What non-pozzed translation of the Bible do I fucking read?

any of them
>except th gideon bible
>who's alteration, printing, and distribution were all financed by kikes

>>512495315
>Christians can't agree on a bible

LOL

>>512509106
it is

but there's also rules to follow

so therefore, yo have rules to follow, and if you dont follow them, you aren't worshiping Jesus

so simple, yet so complicated for you for some reason?

>>512003883
>Christianity showed its kike-loving colors when it didn't unite behind Hitler.
what kind of retarded statement is this?

Christianity isn't united today and hasn't been for a long ti--- OH WAIT

>>510425361
>they did practice child sacrifice and it made God mad af in the Old Testament

sure did fren, and there's universal agreement across all verisions of the bible as well

>>510134879
>The Nazis burned Jews simply because they were Jews

oook faggot give it a rest

>>509991409
>the bible is wrong
prove it

>I can't
welp

>>509482884
lol

you just keep changing the subject

>>509482478
>show source of this study

>>509482640

then suddenly
>>509482884
>you dont seem to understand

lel

retard

seeing a lot off butthurt, ad-hom, etc

not seeing you providing any sources that refute my argument, or my sources for that matter

maybe if you make more butthurt replies where you can't prove shit, you'll sway the audience?

>>509372955
that is a LOT of
>(((talk)))
and not a
>single
source

y tho?