>>60684768
>i was mad
Were you a grumpy wumpy seethy weethy?

>>60616471
Twas revealed to me in a dream

>>60593245
You didn't like it? I figured it would a total bananza! What didn't you find so appealing?

>>60584562
>Dodges the question.
Oh, so you don't want the shortsellers to lose their collateral backstopping the GME short position. Interesting. I thought you wanted money, wouldn't this be the quickest way to force shorts to close to take their money in a BBBY lawsuit?
>kek shillies

>>60548918
Go on lad, don't be shy**