>>719152880
>How's the PC performance? Is it optimized well?
Eh, it's not atrocious. But considering that the playable areas are the exactly the same as the PS2 version it boggles the mind why the requirements are so high. I bet my ass they used nanite on masked materials which just craters performance. Still you can get 60 ish on a 3060 on medium with DLSS set to performance. It's not bad, it's not great either but I'm having fun being a glowie, doing glowie things so that makes it OK. Pirate it to test it.

>I only have a normal PS5 so not really looking to buy it on that desu
PC runs better than on PS5. Just don't do 4k.

>>719152962
Spyro and Crash 4 are also on PS5 and they run buttery smooth. What now?

>>719067689
>Performance is shit
I bet my ass the vegetation is using planes with transparency instead of actual meshes and they slapped nanite on everything. Which would tank performance because nanite absolutely hates masked materials. Slap Lumen on top of it and it also hates masked materials. It is literally far more performant to have ~1 polys per blade of grass with Nanite turned on than whatever they did. This game was probably made on Unreal 5.1 or 5.2. We're gonna see shit performance from Unreal games for a few more years.