>>544743328
Well, for something like Cystic Fibrosis which among my genetic heritage (white western european, specifically English, Irish, and Scottish ethnic groups) has a carrier rate of roughly 1 in 25. Under normal circumstances the chances of two randomly-selected people from this population group producing a child with Cystic Fibrosis is .04% or 1/2500 children. By comparison, a brother-sister couple (also randomly selected from this population) is 6.25x more likely to produce a child with Cystic Fibrosis, which amounts to a whopping... 0.25% chance. For reference, you're slightly more than four times as likely to die in a car crash over the course of your lifetime in America than you are to produce a defective baby with your sisterwife.

Anyway, thanks for playing.

>>543229912
Ashley is a spiritual American, thus everything she has eaten has been burger.

>>538283809
So, ultimately, you have no fucking point and are just being butthurt. The crux of the argument is that the new covenant does not forbid union between brother and sister, the new covenant also supercedes and replaces the old covenants, and that the standards laid out against adultery apply universally rather than just to your sister in particular. You're needling pointless details because you have no leg to stand on when it comes to the original point. Again, to re-iterate, the original point being that the new covenant *does not* forbid a permanent, lifelong union between siblings in matrimony, and the only argument you've presented against it is one which applies universally regardless of consanguinity. Your concession is not accepted.