>>720447598
They know they have already won, so why put in the effort? They basically need only Mario to survive for the next 100 years.

>>714304717
Maybe, but Nintendo has the uncanny ability to rise from the ashes whenever things start getting bad for them. The Gamecube wasn't successful? Fine, let's make a revolutionary console that will influence the whole industry. Its successor, the Wii U, wasn't successful? Alright, let's do our magic again. Following this logic, it should be the turn of the Switch 2 to flop, but apparently it's doing quite well despite not having a solid release library. I don't know how they do it, but they are simply luckier and/or more talented with their management than other companies.