>>719147528
My OLED stays at 0 brightness during morning/night, 30 most of the day, 60 if I have my skylight window directly in front of it open, maaaybe 80 when pushing it. Unless your room is surrounded by natural light on all sides, maximum brightness is never an issue. If you live in a mansion with fully structural windowed walls then sure.

True on text clarify IF 1) You don't change an option in windows for pentile displays, which mine is considering it's from 2020 (still zero burn-in btw, main PC/console monitor 12h+ daily) however LG Display has moved away from pentile subpixels as of late IIRC so this is a non-factor. And 2) if you bought a small (now old) desk monitor rather than 48"/55" stand monitor ~1m+ away from the desk, where PPI text issues are not noticeable.

You got me with VRR, which apparently is still an issue inherent to the tech. I wouldn't know since I never used it. Limiting FPS and/or using Vsync has worked before and will in future. But fair

>>719147821
-Yes? Among the main advantages?
-No. Cheapest way to get amazing quality. You wouldn't compare OLEDS to TN panels but rather to professional dual layed LCD's. Like I said, if your budget is below $500 why even BEGIN to care about this topic? You can get 48/55"C models below $1000 nowadays. Brand new ones cost more sure, but way below equivalent alternatives.
-BFI isn't needed in OLEDs, they are inherently superior.
-insert Everything about non-OLEDS, which makes it worse than burn-in day1
-True. If you live in a window mansion and keep it at 100 brightness all day, ABL will kick in
-Again, who uses VRR? Is it implemented well in all games? Genuine question, I just limit fps and I'm good to go.
-Plasma TVs were a thing. Anecdotally 2 of my LCDs shat their pants while the OLED's still perfect (see white ring'd BenQ on the right). Lastly, if you get warranty for ~10% extra, every half decade people go to your home and change the whole panel no questions asked. I haven't even done it yet.

>>717792259
I've had my 48" LG OLED since 2020.

Absolute zero burn-in and I use it 12h+ daily as a main PC and console monitor.
The only thing I don't do is fullscreen the browser like a retard (too big for most content anyway), and place static icons on the 2nd monitor instead. Still watch media and play games full screen with no consideration toward burn-in, although I don't stick to the same game for years on end.

My BenQ IPS did shit the bed however, with a permanent white-yellow ring around it that suffers from image retention, though not bad enough for me to care. It being an IPS instead of OLED makes the image quality so shit and subpar anyway that this legit flaw doesn't detract any more than it not being an OLED already does.

I fail to understand the burn-in meme. As soon as you buy any non-OLED your monitor is extremely flawed even if it was manufactured perfectly (It won't be, especially inconsistent backlighting in the usual price bracket, something to be expected and can't be traded for in most cases). It looks so shit by comparison.
It's like if all humans had myopia, and you are the select few spouting the downsides of using glasses. How they scratch or even break, etc. While looking at the world at 10% gaussian blur, unnaware of their benefit.