>>512793494
I derive my conception of God by what people intuitively mean when they say "Oh my God" and "Thank God" and the like, something that even most supposed atheists do. It's what the consensus of Humanity actually understands the word to mean in the moments that they're not censoring and distorting their own beliefs with internalized dogma. God, as intuitively understood, isn't any particular Deity (not Jesus, not Jewhovah, not Jupiter or what have you), it's Divinity. And empirically it's quite evident that Divinity permeates everything and animates the cosmos.

>>23092182
I derive my conception of God by what people intuitively mean when they say "Oh my God" and "Thank God" and the like, something that even most supposed atheists do. It's what the consensus of Humanity actually understands the word to mean in the moments that they're not censoring and distorting their own beliefs with internalized dogma. God, as intuitively understood, isn't any particular Deity (not Jesus, not Jewhovah, not Jupiter or what have you), it's Divinity. And empirically it's quite evident that Divinity permeates everything and animates the cosmos.

>>510629514
The fact that 2+2 is never Not 4 proves that there exist immutable truths, that being one of them, that define the state of the universe and necessitate it. "God" is whatever predicates the existence, nature, and course of the universe, because whatever does so is necessarily God because that's what it means for something to be God. If it's a flying spaghetti monster, then the flying spaghetti monster is God, and if it's a set of immutable truths (one that is easily proven to exist), then the set of immutable truths is God.