>>281677556
>>281679503
>>281679581
>You do not get to complain about Inherited Sin if you will not acknowledge the unfairness of Inherited Grace.
Its inherently unfair for an immortal being to give his life and still have it. he has not sacrificed anything in doing so.
so yes, its inherently unfair to set this all up in his """infinate""" wisdom.
however despite feeling like I had to get that out there through your retarded ass
I want to actually call attention to some truthnukes I have about original sin and the inheretedness of original sin
I don't know how many spaces I need to put for people to fucking pay attention but the punishment for the original sin was civilization: Adam and eve lose access to the garden of eden, and adam must go toil and eat the plant, and eve must endure many painful births as is the lot of women in the fecund but nutritionally and hardship ridden lot of civilization. Naturally every child they bore also inherited the sin, since they are being born into society. I'm sure some christfags will argue that god had some kind of mythical meaning here and that humans really where immortal before this event, but even if they were, so what? at that point adam and eve were basically dogs. no more aware of anything and could be tricked by a stupid snake. It's pretty ridiculous for anyone to believe adam and eve meaningfully had a future to look forward to if they did not bite the apple. the future where humanity stayed animals is all that would have occurred.
