>>24668927
>mad god
Is that the insane Dante's Inferno but claymation thing? I thought I hallucinated that movie. My vote is for Princesses Bride, but that's nostalgia. Like the other anon ssaid, Ichi the Killer is one of my favorites as a weird guro, and both Good Will Hunting and Eternal Sunshine are like "good" movies. Apocalypse Now is also great, but a bit heavy.

>>24633860
>"It's not an ideological addendum, It's a real argument!"
>She says, ignoring everything that makes a real argument, while applying an additional ideological addendum.
Miss, you are hysterical and I suggest you research argumentation if you want to discuss the subject further with anyone who isnt trolling you. This reads like parody, but your conviction implies it's not. I mean "literal stacks of foetuses spilling out of plastic bags on the street" sure is evocative; got nothing to do with refuting a legal framework permiting an ethically dubious action as a mimimum compliance.

To be very clear and very specific, your position is "women are going to do it anyways and will ignore anything that prevents this, so therefore it is a greater reduction in harm to provide them a safe place to do so because an existing human has more value than a potential one", which is a utilitarian argument relative to the aggregate felecity of harm reduction, as well as an ontological argument about when competing rights take priority relative to the "humanness" of a fetus. All the purple prose in the world wont convince anyone of any significance if you dont understand the inflection points of your argument, and the specifics that justify your position. Research your position. Understand the ethical system you're advocating for. Then articulate your thesis clearly with supporting premises.

>>511176817
>dumbass advocating for social media has a limited vocabulary
Shocker. You could besmirch both my girth and my diction; my lexicon fresher than a breath mint addiction.

>>509525597
Dance in your palm? My destiny is compelling me to call you a retard because you're acting retarded. Is that the path you chose and enjoy? I dont think it is, and if it was, that's the kind of choice a retard would make for retarded reasons, so I guess power to you.

>>509525873
Glad to hear it. I didnt even need to give you the kamina "if you cant believe in yourself believe in the me that believes in you" thing. You've got this anon, all you need to do is go forward one step at a time. Why? If you stop you'll never go anywhere, and the journey is as meaningful as the destination.

>>509265574
>why dont you do my job for me and show me information I havent read, dont know, and have no interest in learning
Nope. I can do one or two, but I get paid to do this shit. You're welcome to read and explain them, then I'll point out how they're misleading, but you are the one posting graphs you dont understand, you should explain them.

>>508583653
>My pastas still reverberate through the anals of this place
As all good pasta should. But "annals" is history, "anals" is butt stuff.

>>508120483
No, but you appear to be, dumbass anon who has resorted to insults instead of arguing because he lacks the capacity. Is the summer breaking going well, sport? You're obviously new here, you'll get the hang of talking to people smarter than you eventually. You can always learn more by researching the subject you feel passionately about instead of doing a retard dance and embarassing yourself. I mean, I enjoy it, but it's not like you've said anything of merit beyond dismissing the argument entirely. Reread your posts, highlight anything illuminating you've said. You'll find the list as vacant as your head and your bed.