>coworker takes his DS to work
>same coworker takes his Nintendo Switch to work
>everyone say he's an idiotic manchild
>I think he's the coolest person in the company for not giving a fuck what bitches say
This was years ago, by the way.
4chan Search
6 results for "c82b61b68b0cc0adf8cddbddf1faaf01"
can millennials and zoomers at least agree that NEETing is the only reasonable thing left to do?
>>24812380
>>24812604
Very uneducated responses.
>>24812345
You should first decide the style. And you can often paraphrase in narration for more mundane exchanges. Not every greeting needs to be
>"Hello," said character
>"Hey," character said back.
etc.
It can easily be
>They exchanged casual greetings.
These are just unfluffed plain examples. You can often insert more direct meaning in the latter. But sometimes you don't want to be direct, so the former can offer more ambiguity in meaning, however the latter can offer ambiguity in its own way by disguising verbatim. Writing every line of an exchange no matter how trivial would be exhausting and tedious to read and is what you'd find in crappy stuff like romance novels.
Take a look at any good novel and see how infrequently they do constant back and forth exchanges. Writers are always looking for ways to evade repetition. But that isn't to say back and forth exchanges are inherently bad or should be avoided entirely. You need to recognise when what EXACTLY a character is saying is relevant and exciting.
>>24812604
Very uneducated responses.
>>24812345
You should first decide the style. And you can often paraphrase in narration for more mundane exchanges. Not every greeting needs to be
>"Hello," said character
>"Hey," character said back.
etc.
It can easily be
>They exchanged casual greetings.
These are just unfluffed plain examples. You can often insert more direct meaning in the latter. But sometimes you don't want to be direct, so the former can offer more ambiguity in meaning, however the latter can offer ambiguity in its own way by disguising verbatim. Writing every line of an exchange no matter how trivial would be exhausting and tedious to read and is what you'd find in crappy stuff like romance novels.
Take a look at any good novel and see how infrequently they do constant back and forth exchanges. Writers are always looking for ways to evade repetition. But that isn't to say back and forth exchanges are inherently bad or should be avoided entirely. You need to recognise when what EXACTLY a character is saying is relevant and exciting.
>>718809123
Because there's no specification so I gave both answers
Because there's no specification so I gave both answers
