>>28490843
>That's the problem with you isn't it?
My problem is that we can't settle in an objective way though violence.
>True enough words can mean different things to different people
See?
>you can't think outside the containers of your partisan status games
Again with the strawman.
>Nothing I have said anywhere so far is not understandable to anyone not opposed to understanding it. I've made the point and restated it in other words and made it abundantly clear and impossible to miss for anyone not being purposefully disingenuous
Your "point" is nothing but "taxes bad taxes destroy the economy" with no mention of the larger economic model that frames your reasoning. Makes you sound like you're simply parroting the conclusions you've heard from someone else without being able to trace the reasoning back to its hypothesizes.
>Not only are you economically communist, you are intellectually communist too
R*ddit strawman 2: go off faggot I guess.
>you think ideas are things that always come from 'somewhere else', and not something that comes from people - because in your experience, that is where every complex notion comes from.
Had a friend once tell me he "didn't want to read philosophy books to truly think for himself". If that's your way of confirming you indeed never properly learned about economics, you're only proving my earlier hunch right.
