>>544923647
>the free ranked car rewards
4chan Search
11 results for "ccebf7fb57c2cb99ede807aa6fb13e67"
>>11596562
How the fuck does me saying they're one of the worst places to buy imports from and listing superior places to buy from in the next reply = I use them for import releases? And there are anons in this very thread posting their import pre-orders from them, you blind cunt.
How the fuck does me saying they're one of the worst places to buy imports from and listing superior places to buy from in the next reply = I use them for import releases? And there are anons in this very thread posting their import pre-orders from them, you blind cunt.
>>150825297
READ THE NEXT LINE DIPSHIT.
READ THE NEXT LINE DIPSHIT.
>>537823831
stupidity has a cure
stupidity has a cure
>>102355058
>>102355074
more than half of that archive is more tame than an average /swarm/pedo post if you actually bothered to open your own bait
>where's your evidence
right next to (you) >>102354925
>>102355074
more than half of that archive is more tame than an average /swarm/pedo post if you actually bothered to open your own bait
>where's your evidence
right next to (you) >>102354925
>>28490843
>That's the problem with you isn't it?
My problem is that we can't settle in an objective way though violence.
>True enough words can mean different things to different people
See?
>you can't think outside the containers of your partisan status games
Again with the strawman.
>Nothing I have said anywhere so far is not understandable to anyone not opposed to understanding it. I've made the point and restated it in other words and made it abundantly clear and impossible to miss for anyone not being purposefully disingenuous
Your "point" is nothing but "taxes bad taxes destroy the economy" with no mention of the larger economic model that frames your reasoning. Makes you sound like you're simply parroting the conclusions you've heard from someone else without being able to trace the reasoning back to its hypothesizes.
>Not only are you economically communist, you are intellectually communist too
R*ddit strawman 2: go off faggot I guess.
>you think ideas are things that always come from 'somewhere else', and not something that comes from people - because in your experience, that is where every complex notion comes from.
Had a friend once tell me he "didn't want to read philosophy books to truly think for himself". If that's your way of confirming you indeed never properly learned about economics, you're only proving my earlier hunch right.
>That's the problem with you isn't it?
My problem is that we can't settle in an objective way though violence.
>True enough words can mean different things to different people
See?
>you can't think outside the containers of your partisan status games
Again with the strawman.
>Nothing I have said anywhere so far is not understandable to anyone not opposed to understanding it. I've made the point and restated it in other words and made it abundantly clear and impossible to miss for anyone not being purposefully disingenuous
Your "point" is nothing but "taxes bad taxes destroy the economy" with no mention of the larger economic model that frames your reasoning. Makes you sound like you're simply parroting the conclusions you've heard from someone else without being able to trace the reasoning back to its hypothesizes.
>Not only are you economically communist, you are intellectually communist too
R*ddit strawman 2: go off faggot I guess.
>you think ideas are things that always come from 'somewhere else', and not something that comes from people - because in your experience, that is where every complex notion comes from.
Had a friend once tell me he "didn't want to read philosophy books to truly think for himself". If that's your way of confirming you indeed never properly learned about economics, you're only proving my earlier hunch right.
>>17776123
Again you are ignoring the rest of my post at your own convenience. When and because *WE* choose means individuals can make that choice for themselves. You choose to live? You should be alive. You choose to die? You should die. Your individual life is your property, and as such you are free to do with it as you see fit provided you also respect that aspect in the life of another human.
Again you are ignoring the rest of my post at your own convenience. When and because *WE* choose means individuals can make that choice for themselves. You choose to live? You should be alive. You choose to die? You should die. Your individual life is your property, and as such you are free to do with it as you see fit provided you also respect that aspect in the life of another human.