>>718998052
>And I'm saying your full of shit unless you're going to supply evidence of your claim. SIZEABLE evidence for such a claim as a beloved game having shit writing.
I'm not going to bother providing something we've passed around our general for years now every time a new game comes out you fucking tourist tranny
go spoon feed yourself, the archives exist. the dates for these games are known
kys.
>why dont you prove yet another thing even though I could have done my own research before giving my own opinion on this subject I clearly know so little about
I miss when it used to be common practice to ban people like this.
