>>536206394
>LR has no relevancy to the discussion I was having regarding sexuality
Hard disagree.
Sexuality is one of LiS that is repeatedly fumbled, to the point that it can be considered pretty problematic. LR is a similar game, made by the same studio and also handles sexuality; Just in a far better way, having clearly learnt from the failures of LiS. Thus it is valid as a direct point of comparison.
By studying how LiS failed, we can better appreciate how LR succeeded.