4 results for "d5f5c328f3d1e10d19d2e342310bcdab"
>>520541378
>Why are Ukrainians so bad at warfare?
They spent every election cycle since the collapse of the soviet union reducing defense spending, letting arms dealers sell off their existing arsenal to shitholes like liberia, and playing games of brinkmanship against russia
>>520541711
>what are they supposed to do?
Don't spend forty years tearing your own military to shreds and thumbing it to your large belligerent neighbor and flirting with the one explicit war condition that they've threatened you with for decades
>>724035649
>wrong
Nothing, AMD is half of a duopoly. The CEOs of AMD and Nvidia are cousins.
>>723324821
Not taking anything away from Hannibal here, but I just find it hilarious how in that era you were considered a military genius for getting your cavalry to not go full greed-retard raiding the enemy baggage train, instead of coming back to hammer and anvil the enemy infantry.
>>2135877
From the top of my head:
-You can choose their composition. You can put supply trains and engineers in it wich are essential for long sieges. And in this game stuff like heavy infantry and elephants are king. Plus some kind of units might synergize better with your countries military tradition. Carthage for example can get a shitton of elephants and then a military tradition who makes those elephants extremely cheap.
-You can drill them. This makes them take less damage in battle and provides you with steady military tradition.
-They build roads for as cheap as 10 gold per tile. This are fundamental if you have a large empire plus give you a number of bonuses. Including import routes in your capital.
On top of that you don't get war exhaustion with them unlike with levies, they can get distinction wich makes them better and you can choose their own generals with the better martial stat while the governor of the province can be chosen for his finesse to keep the province loyal.