>>64152017
If /pol/estinians were able to they would have come up with any number of retorts by now, but as
>>64152034 and
>>64151872
demonstrate, they are ignorant, lazy, and incapable of arguing in good faith.
Instead, they resort to ad hominem, deflection, or goalpost moving, because they know they don't have a leg to stand on.
>“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.” - Carl Sandburg
I like to use the Kashmiri Hindu Pandit ethnic cleansing as a comparison:
>Hindus forced out of Kashmir by Pakistan
>Didn’t start launching rockets into Pakistani civilian areas
>Didn't declare a Hindu crusade against Muslims, >Didn't fund and arm Hindu militias who would routinely hop the border blow up markets, burn infants, gang-rape women, behead foreign workers, and commit mass shootings.
/pol/estinian logic would justify India not just waging wars against Pakistan in perpetuity, but fighting for its total annihilation. Ironically, Pakistan already declared the destruction of India as part of their military doctrine back in 1965, but the rest of the world just accepts that since barbarity is part of Muslim culture.
>Koran 2:191- Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.
>Koran 3:28 - Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.
>Koran 3:85 - Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
>Koran 5:33 - Maim and crucify infidels if they criticize Islam.
>Koran 8:12 - Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur'an.
>Koran 9:5 - When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.
>Koran 9:123 - Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.
>Koran 22:19 - Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.
>Quran 47:4 - Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.
Religion of peace, though.