>>510597203
No. He has been mentioned by one of the victims specifically as having not been involved, and I think his initial fervor for releasing the information was honest.
I think either he was threatened with something else, or they have blackmail material over someone in his family, or they have altered the information to show him or someone from his family as being involved and then he received bad advice about how to handle that (he should have released it anyway).
In any case, I'm not happy about how he's handled it, but I still don't regret voting for him over the alternatives. Bear in mind I'm not saying what he's doing is right or should go unanswered, but he has done a lot of good so far (except this and the vax), and I will not be voting for the people in favor of turning children's penises inside out.