>>82474477
i see. i was thinking you were meaning that the GOP was the proximate or even sole cause of a hypothetical domestic armed conflict in which millions would die in various ways. i was wrong! thanks for answering.

you're certainly not wrong that the economic collapse will be worse (and much, i think!) than 2008- although fairly foolish to think the opposing national party would be able to avoid this collapse through....well, whatever you think. the chickens have a lot of inertia in this case, world reserve currency and all. but they're coming home to roost. few years out, but they'll be roosting. always do. i would very much like to know what specifically Democrats, even if given carte blanche, would do differently to mitigate or prevent this coming economic depression.

climate change i ain't even talking about that. we very obviously need to pour beaucoup shekels into both R&D and construction of new nuclear power facilities.

>>81794114
but i do not support a representative republican form of gub'mint, much less democracy. yes, i AM a bad person because of this. we are your fellow countrymen. enjoy!