>>518561287
>>518561423
>>518561585
Have you read any Evola in your lifetime? If it's legal in Poland idk how much censorship you have in your country.

You fucks keep on harping about gassing kikes and racewars but nothing ever happens and world is progressively worse and worse day after day. It's over.
Pedos are in charge and they are banning speech in the guise of hate speech/protection of children.

POV: felt like having a pastizz.

It was a cover up for Jörg Haider's death.

>>60647060
checked

>>76311742
>maybe you're low T
Once a day is low T. I go 5 times.

>>33267251
Love is an abstract idea; if you can imagine it, it's real. What you're asking is whether successful relationships exist, and obviously they do. That doesn't mean you can't be fooled by your own emotions; it just means emotions can never be the full picture. Your neurochemical reaction to the start of a relationship is meant to encourage going deeper into it, not support the entire thing. You have to consider the relationship itself if you want it to last, which obviously involves both parties.

> tldr: yes, but only for people who have emotional intelligence sufficient for that purpose

*zit op je*
hé, wat zei je nou over vrouwen in de keuken op nederdraad?????

>>60516777
Checked