>>76557456
>you're replacing normal human interactions with "manipulating", strawman
It's not a strawman! I just finished explaining to you that adults and children are developmentally different. They are physically different. They are psychologically different. There are physiological neurological differences between adults and children. The interactions you say are normal between adults that you're trying to say are "normal" between an adult and a child are literally and factually not normal.
>neither am I
Yes, you are. Adults engaging in consensual dating and courtship know what they are getting into. A child still doesn't understand the implications. A child doesn't even have the neurological maturity much less full sexual maturity. But, you do intend to make a child into a prospective sexual partner for yourself.
>someone with a background of knowledge and life experience you have the capability to share that knowledge
You intend to use your "knowledge" as a brainwashing technique to install ideas into a child's mind in lieu of allowing them to learn through normal life experience. There is NO EQUIVALENT to this in adult romantic relationships, aside from extremely unhealthy dysfunctional/abusive relationships
>gets off on making fat women into sex objects
Yeah, when I'm out of town on vacation somewhere, and we both know what the game is. I don't get off on "dating" children in a situation where they are without the full knowledge of the consequences because they're physiologically incapable of understanding
>they don't make relationships with young women immoral
You don't need for the interaction between an adult and child to escalate to rape or murder in order for it to immoral. Your intentions with that child are what make them immoral.
>I just want to be in a relationship with her just as I would with any woman.
Then why not just date an adult woman instead? Oh, that's right. You probably feel intimidated by a woman with an adult intellect
kys
