>>76557318
>Not if you brainwashed her into thinking you are the only thing her future ought to revolve around.
Like you take a woman out on a date and try to brainwash her into thinking that you are the only thing her future ought to revolve around?
>educating her
>This is called grooming
So parents raising their kid is grooming? Schools teaching kids is grooming? When you teach her what taxes are and how the government is taking advantage of you and how you should exploit them for your personal gain is grooming? Guess we should just outlaw all of that.
>It's hook-up culture.
It's called grooming and it's predatory, you are preying on women in an attempt to sexually exploit them, you are a predator and a rapist.
>We each have enough life experience to know what we want out of each other
Yeah, so did all the victims of Jeffrey Dahmer, look at how they ended up, so we should just ban all human interaction because there are sick people out there who want to rape and dismember others, right?
>You, on the other hand, want to brainwash a child until you have created your own perfect "wife" through your manipulation.
No? You're being intentionally obtuse and replacing normal things that people do with negative things in an attempt to portray me in a negative light. Like when you want to watch a movie with her it's netflix and chill but when I want to watch a movie with her it's rope and child pornography, it's a shitty strawman, but of course that's all you have going for you.
Again, you aren't presenting any arguments based on logic or deduction, you are only appealing to emotion and throwing around buzzwords with negative connotations, akin to low-IQ retards calling everyone they don't like a nazi, you're literally more retarded than any child I've spoken to.
