>>18098185
Deuteronomy 24:16, Ezekiel 18:20
4chan Search
8 results for "e17d2a51c039cafa7cc0aeb6a85a42fb"
>>519366386
1 Kings 8:48-50
>if they return unto Thee with all their heart and with all their soul in the land of their enemies, who carried them captive, and pray unto Thee toward their land, which Thou gavest unto their fathers, the city which Thou hast chosen, and the house which I have built for Thy name; then hear Thou their prayer and their supplication in heaven Thy dwelling-place, and maintain their cause; and forgive Thy people who have sinned against Thee, and all their transgressions wherein they have transgressed against Thee; and give them compassion before those who carried them captive, that they may have compassion on them;
Deuteronomy 4:27-29
>And the LORD shall scatter you among the peoples, and ye shall be left few in number among the nations, whither the LORD shall lead you away. And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men’s hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell. But from thence ye will seek the LORD thy God; and thou shalt find Him, if thou search after Him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
Hosea 3:4
>For the children of Israel shall abide many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillar, without ephod or teraphim.
No. Christians doubled down on the sacrifice part and made it the only path to atonement. Judaism doesn't need the sacrificial system. It was there to reinforce the existing theological thought for the Jews.
1 Kings 8:48-50
>if they return unto Thee with all their heart and with all their soul in the land of their enemies, who carried them captive, and pray unto Thee toward their land, which Thou gavest unto their fathers, the city which Thou hast chosen, and the house which I have built for Thy name; then hear Thou their prayer and their supplication in heaven Thy dwelling-place, and maintain their cause; and forgive Thy people who have sinned against Thee, and all their transgressions wherein they have transgressed against Thee; and give them compassion before those who carried them captive, that they may have compassion on them;
Deuteronomy 4:27-29
>And the LORD shall scatter you among the peoples, and ye shall be left few in number among the nations, whither the LORD shall lead you away. And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men’s hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell. But from thence ye will seek the LORD thy God; and thou shalt find Him, if thou search after Him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
Hosea 3:4
>For the children of Israel shall abide many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillar, without ephod or teraphim.
No. Christians doubled down on the sacrifice part and made it the only path to atonement. Judaism doesn't need the sacrificial system. It was there to reinforce the existing theological thought for the Jews.
>>518810485
>read the bible
>see Christianity's obvious contradictions
>convert to the real religion
>get accused of being mind controlled
being chosen ain't easy
>read the bible
>see Christianity's obvious contradictions
>convert to the real religion
>get accused of being mind controlled
being chosen ain't easy
>>515059165
no
>>515058466
>that pic
According to the logic in that pic Judaism is less Jewish than Christianity. Sorry but I don't have more time for Toffee Posting today. That's all you guys get.
no
>>515058466
>that pic
According to the logic in that pic Judaism is less Jewish than Christianity. Sorry but I don't have more time for Toffee Posting today. That's all you guys get.
Toffee Posting Day 2
Christianity is also flawed because Jeremiah warns that sacrifices alone won't save you. Christianity doubles down on the idea that it will with their singular, allegedly, final one. Hebrews 9:22 claims a monopoly on atonement through the blood of Jesus. However, there are many examples of atonement in the Tanakh without blood.
>Daniel lived in between the two temples and he told Nebuchadnezzar to atone by giving charity.
>The non-Jews of Nineveh were spared from God's wrath without any blood being shed.
>Solomon prophetically warns about what to do if there was no access to the temple.
>Even during the temple period if you were a broke ass poor nigga you could offer and ephah of flour
>God even forgives people simply because he is based and merciful.
Jews always had a basis for their religion in the absence of any temple.
https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/leviticus-1711/
>Daniel lived in between the two temples and he told Nebuchadnezzar to atone by giving charity.
>The non-Jews of Nineveh were spared from God's wrath without any blood being shed.
>Solomon prophetically warns about what to do if there was no access to the temple.
>Even during the temple period if you were a broke ass poor nigga you could offer and ephah of flour
>God even forgives people simply because he is based and merciful.
Jews always had a basis for their religion in the absence of any temple.
https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/leviticus-1711/
Toffee Posting General
The Jewish God is indivisible and without peers. Jew's most important prayer is the Shema which affirms this singular God. They mean unity as singular and all encompassing (uni) whereas Christians think of unity as a harmony of several. Triune, a combination of the words tri and unity, is an oxymoronic expression of cognitive dissonance.
Another example of word games being played is the sacrifice of Jesus. Regardless of how the argument plays out of whether he is God or not the fact remains he is in the flesh of a man. This makes him completely ineligible to be a sacrifice at all. How do Christians cope with this very obvious prohibition on human sacrifice? They use a linguistic sleight of hand by calling him a lamb, the Lamb of God, and hope no one questions it. Even if Jesus was a furry and declared his fursona to be a lamb it still wouldn't count.
Why are Christians disingenuous wordcels?
Another example of word games being played is the sacrifice of Jesus. Regardless of how the argument plays out of whether he is God or not the fact remains he is in the flesh of a man. This makes him completely ineligible to be a sacrifice at all. How do Christians cope with this very obvious prohibition on human sacrifice? They use a linguistic sleight of hand by calling him a lamb, the Lamb of God, and hope no one questions it. Even if Jesus was a furry and declared his fursona to be a lamb it still wouldn't count.
Why are Christians disingenuous wordcels?
>>510074066
>he really did die
No. Did the Father and the Holy Spirit also die or did he just let his meat suit get mutilated?
>he really did die
No. Did the Father and the Holy Spirit also die or did he just let his meat suit get mutilated?