Search results for "e603fc1ec48836399b66ba561d10f505" in md5 (5)

/his/ - Thread 17971468
Anonymous No.17973279
>>17971869
Probably closer to this. Women counted on men to wed and house them while building the country and it's infrastructure. Women to a certain extent could MAYBE make it on their own before, but I doubt it. The amount of "successful" women homeowners now is actually frightening and abnormal and is going to be destructive I quite frankly believe.
/lit/ - Thread 24692643
Anonymous No.24694190
It's true in the sense women are genetic selectors. They are not actually good at this, but it's an immutable reality. If you don't fit the criteria of womens' collective "today" for what is attractive then you are unlikely to be selected by any of them, as even the most rebellious women act in accordance with what women think. Combine this with an increasingly gynocentric society where women are increasingly put into positions of power and make increasing amounts of the laws and rules, and you extrapolate this selection model into a wider environment. It's not a coincidence Greece began seriously collapsing once large amounts of political roles were inhabited by women. In any case, you won't persuade anyone who isn't already aware into considering any of this. Any attempts to do so will yield innumerable amounts of "well I knew an exception to the rule >>24693077 so therefore it isn't happening" and similar Niggers With Breakfast intellectual pitfalls.
/int/ - Thread 214226562
Anonymous Argentina No.214238102
>>214236751
>evolution
>mathematically perfect outcome
Nature fucks up plenty. We're also not living in a scenario where natural selection happens that much anymore. We've messed with the natural balance of things, keep undesirables alive and produce an over abundance of stuff. The kind of evolutionary pressures we're experiencing, and the evolutionary pressures that people select for are two different things
/lgbt/ - Thread 40421986
Anonymous No.40423284
>>40423205
If you feel happier that way go for it! But I want to make it clear that womanhood is not ontologically evil, it's just the result of various evolutionary pressures affecting our species. All of the situations they are in are a result of sexual selection gone wrong. Without it however we'd be way less fit and probably have been long extinct
/fit/ - Thread 76345478
Anonymous No.76345915
>>76345478
>Women are the only ones still keeping the lankycoin afloat by having prehistoric notions of whats relevant in a man
Women ruining everything because they are retarded is a universal theme, even in the rest of the animal kingdom
Look up fisherian runaway (pic rel)