>>520446997 >That's just a journal article. Anybody can write one and submit it
holy cope >But I stand by my point.
there's the video you're ignoring but ok schlomo >>520430855
>>519279563 >You're talking to people who think the 9/11 planes were CGI
Spotted the retard who believes a flying aluminium can, goes through the side of a heavily reinforced steel and concrete, as easily as hot a hot knife goes through butter.
Are these magical planes that do this in the room with you right now anon?
>>518915876 >It's literal evidence that he did nothing. Are you upset that I responded to you with the same quality of reply you're giving me?
no >That's not an argument.
yes it is. >Short term memory loss? It's mentioned in the image YOU posted here
So are swatch watches. Talking about Swatch is as related. I.e. not. >You're not even aware of what is in your own images?
There's probably a blue pixel there too, talking about the color blue is similarly as irrelevant. >Nah, I just say "You choose to not understand" more as a definite stance that it is wholly your choice where this conversation goes.
k >If calling someone a bot because they point out that you haven't made much of any argument at all is schizophrenic
k
>>515549554 >thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive
correct
it was used to cut the plane shaped holes in the super structure
which an aluminum plane could never do.
>>513608129 >trust the science.
get vaxxed faggot ask any AI and watch how fast it shuts you down or pretends not to understand the prompt.
I'm sorry op not trying to derail
>>512171097 >Who fired the missile and why they covered it up as a plane?
wait until you realize there were no planes involved at all.
ZERO plane wrecks.
not one.
>>507251605
watch "September Clues" for no plane stuff
watch Irrefutable (on youtube) for how the collapses were handled (a hidden tech called DEW).
yes, I have many many many videos.