>>528450467
>your first point is wrong because if its subjective then why would they change it to be generalized
To appeal to the broadest audience, even if (you) are not a part of that.
>so you dont miss out on the collection aspect
Congrats, idiot. You just answered your own question, "why would people prefer to roll for potentially shit units than always good ones?"
Dunno why you asked it, then. I think you're just retarded.
