>>717779321
>>717779996
nta but
>Pattern recognition
really broad topic, basically ai is much better at computer vision for an arbitrary scene than anything else, it picks out multi-scale features quickly using extremeley limited datasets
>complex physics calculations
that's an entire subfield at this point, fluid mechanics calculation alone is a good application, the biggest however is parameter space search where a MCMC is not feasible to do with an extreme (1000+) free parameters, this applies to quite literally every field of not only physics but science in general
>text processing
one of the first things it solved well and was implemented in all US post office processing, its story is a pretty large focal point in the history of ai at this point:
https://www.buffalo.edu/cubs/research/pioneers-in-ai-systems.html
>and automating creative tasks
kinda self explanatory, thousands of examples online, many of which you dont realize because its ai+human editors together to create whatever work, its a tool for creatives to use, look up david lynch's takes on AI for film and you'll understand pretty well why every serious creative field is already using it

i really wish browns/jeets would stop shilling it as some mythical force or refuse to admit its current limitations, its making it hard to discuss in any online forum seriously