>>41325495
>>41325596
Before anything, disregard anything Christians say, such as this retard. They are little hive-minded golems repetitively derailing everything that doesn't go accordingly with their psyop. And a very basic, old and easily avoidable psyop at that.

>mind = individual psyche, Microcosmos
>Mind = the whole of existence and potential, Macrocosmos
>Wait, it's all me experiencing myself?
Not necessarily. The Mind is the whole. What you call "yourself" is actually a mechanism of your mind. The Mind is experienced by every conscious being, through their minds, and every inanimate being is a construct of this very mind and every underlying prototype of everything that exists or will exist or have existed. So, it's extremely vast. The sensation that everything IS yourself or at least part of yourself is a common misconception. It's more about the concept of representation. Your mind is a representation of the Mind. Your ego (the "myself"), on the other hand, is something else. It's a dude that lives within your personal mind (a representation of the Mind) trying to grasp the Mind, an overworked manager trying to keep small things in order while also accessing (through consciousness alteration/expansion/getting high AF) the representation of the Mind. The microcosmos is a representation of the macrocosmos, the mind is a representation of the Mind. And the ego, within the microcosmos, opens it's eyes for the microcosmos that surrounds it and travels within it, while also exploring the microcosmos (because the microcosmos/personal mind is a representation of the macrocosmos/cosmic mind). So, the ego is unique (yourself), while your mind is a representation of all existence. So your eyes, your impressions, are all parts of the uniqueness of your ego, while the representations are universal. Your (altered) perception reflects this vast reality beyond common cognition.