>>81874514
>>81874538
>woe is me
Rich coming from a woman.
Women get to complain about "microaggressions", Karens out on any man they don't like the look of or cry because people think their botox lips look like bee stings and all society must stop and bend over backwards for them, tell them they're beautiful and always right. Then you have genuinely struggling men who have been alone since they were teenagers and women snap "it's your fault, why don't you just go out and socially socialize with perfect social skills like a turbosocial gigachad hercules", the usual just world fallacy routine.
I can't imagine a more dangerous precedent, the community you were brought up in socially ostracizes you since you were a kid and now as an adult declares they don't actually give a shit about you and never did. It was all a ruse to force you to live alone in a studio apartment working a job where less qualified women and minorities get hired over you for "diversity" while you do their work for them and you are told every step of the way that it is you that is "entitled" and "privileged", that you are "fragile" if you complain about your unfair treatment, that you are the problem. It is almost as though women are imitating the gaslighting of their abusive ex. Not only this, but white women are in on it, they throw them a bone and they sell out their brothers.
It is a social engineering project that started decades ago to isolate white men, starting when they are boys, because this demographic is the biggest threat to the elite. Incidentally that answers
>>81873879 's question.
