/v/ never recovered from 7th gen casualization and Silksong proves it.

tis but a joke back then, has become our sad reality
>>717700659
if it was back then, they would have let you shoot her for the lolz if she broke her leg
sadly nu-weebs are too fragile

>game being le hard is le deal breaker
get the fuck off my board you fucken casuals

>>712522169
nearly every dating sim back in the 90s and 2000s had a bad end where the jock/playboy/richdude of the school would win over your girl or steal her or blackmail her or woo her or pumpndump her or whatever if you were afflicted with skill-issue-itis.
ntr was supposed to be the game over, not getting it was supposed to be the win. then retards came. they demanded an entire genre be made where you can only fail and get game overs. and their games to be brain dead easy where you can only win. otherwise the dev is a projecting cuck. I hate casuals so much its UNREAL.