>>96275690
>You brought up Preacher
I was...60% sure it had a crossover with something DC related by now, but it turns out that was revealed to me in a dream.
>omniscient third-person view
>"vision of God"
Uh, so like...we're considering the God of the original Silent Hill games God as well? Look it's an awe-inspiring manifestation of an acausal force, I don't trust the idiot monkeys who are otherwise mundane normies caught up in it to make accurate theological asssessments about it. Also Kian not correcting Verity doesn't really say that much when he could also just like, not see the point of arguing religion when it's tangible and real.
>Nyarlathotep does that on his own
Nyaralathotep doing that on his own is in fact a reason why the SA sucks.
>Don't blame the actions of others on it
Almost everything is the SA (I am still subscribing to Lovecraft's napkin lore, so Azathoth, Nyarly, the Darkness, and the Nameless Mist still sit outside of the SA's purview). Therefore the SA's structure is inherently reprehensible.
>because he specifically
Which according to you is part of the SA's timeless structure and therefore that failure to access to the boundless truth of all things is an inherent flaw in it. Assuming that it's even as positive an outcome as Carter hopes for. In no story does Carter ever become some kind of enlightened messiah, driving home the cosmic horror themes established in literally every other Lovecraftian story except the one where Yog-Sothoth's son is killed by an angry mob and it's progenitor just farts in response. If the SA is to be equated with Yog-Sothoth, then that right there is it's reaction to it's son's death. A fart.
>if your earnest desire is to just destroy the SA
I can think of one: The SA, lacking change, is inherently incapable of granting that wish. You are simultaneously assuming the SA is immutable and also that it has the means to destroy itself.