>>17979779
>Implying the Romans ever failed in eradicating a rebel tribe
>Implying further they failed so at the very pinnacle of their power and prestige
>Implying for the third time Hadrian would show any mercy at a tribe that continuously attacked Roman citizens
I get it you have to go on with the larp because the rabbis said so, but try to be less obvious. don't mention ancient history when you discuss your tribe's nefarious misdeeds.

>>17925269
>the goyim know
oy vey schmueyl you know what to do

>>17922788
the Jews you speak of were wiped out by Titus and Hadrian
the current ones are not even Semitic to begin with

>>512181049
>mentions the Roman Empire
you are not qualified to continue the discussion in that direction.
>tries to shift blame from jews
it is the modern day equivalent of coin shaving. jews control most banks so jews profit the most. There used to be laws against such things, if you knew your history as well as you claim you do you should at least be aware of what the jews were doing from the Middle Ages in England, Spain, Holland etc. I'm using modern names for those polities not to confuse your little brain further.

>>17798306
oy vey no they wouldn't
>580k went with Titus
>another 500-600k with Hadrian
>the Romans just counted fighting age men
>this was in one of the least populated provinces of the empire
>all within 50 years
>then crickets for 300 years
>ff to V century AD in Iraq some braindead write a talmud and declare themselves 'Judaean'
lol
lmao even
>inb4 sources
learn to read Latin and look them up on google books. play with date ranges and cross-reference
but they are translated as well if you trust the translator's integrity

>>17777842
Only 2/3
The rest was Titus
And don't ask for sources if you don't even know the origins of your cult
Iraq, as I already said.

>>17775216
Retard, it's the jews who got rekt twice for that
second time was particularly thorough

>>507653968
It was good