>”The Jews killed Jesus.”
Um, no? Actually the Romans killed Jesus. Why don’t you persecute the descendants of Rome aka Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Brits, French, Greeks, Turks, Germans, & Romanians, instead of Jews?

Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??


The New Testament accounts state that Roman soldiers were responsible for the literal act of nailing Jesus to the cross. While the chief priests and elders of the people plotted to kill Jesus, it was Roman soldiers who carried out the execution. The book of Acts also mentions that under God's sovereignty, "both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel" were responsible for Jesus' death.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Acts 4:27-28:
This passage states that both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, were responsible for Jesus' death.
Mark 15:24:
This passage explicitly describes the Roman soldiers as nailing Jesus to the cross.
Matthew 27:2-3:
This passage describes the chief priests and elders of the people delivering Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor.
Luke 23:39:
This passage mentions that the Roman soldiers were responsible for carrying out the crucifixion.

>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??

No, the Jews shouted that, lying Jew.

>>17775135 (OP)
The Roman's already got rekt by goth rapefugees for what they did to Jesus

John 19

8 When Pilate heard this, he was even more afraid, 9 and he went back inside the palace. “Where do you come from?” he asked Jesus, but Jesus gave him no answer. 10 “Do you refuse to speak to me?” Pilate said. “Don’t you realize I have power either to free you or to crucify you?”

11 Jesus answered, “You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin.”

12 From then on, Pilate tried to set Jesus free, but the Jewish leaders kept shouting, “If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who claims to be a king opposes Caesar.”

Which means yes, while the Romans killed Jesus in the most literal sense ever, it was still the Pharisees who used them as an instrument of death. Pilate, despite ranking over the Jews in status, still had to keep the peace and listen to their outcries. If he TRULY had power over them, he would've just told them to fuck off, Jesus is innocent, and sent them all home.

It's not much different than people blaming country leaders for their army's soldiers actions. People rarely say, "American soldiers waged war on Afghanistan", they say, "America waged war on Afghanistan" or sometimes might be more specific by saying "the Bush administration".

>>17775135 (OP)
>the Romans
what kind of talmudic pilpul cope is this?
Pilate was in a volatile political situation, he had to give the natives something otherwise they would chimp out as was their custom.
the jews asked for it and arrested Him themselves.
they were the judge and jury, the Romans played the executioner because the jews refused to stone Him which Pilate would have not interfered with even though he personally did not find Jesus guilty of charges brought up against Him

>>17775216
Retard, it's the jews who got rekt twice for that
second time was particularly thorough

>>17775143
>the Jews shouted that
And you are stupid enough to actually believe that happened.

>>17775287
post nose

>>17775135 (OP)
The text is clear that the Jews egged on the Romans to kill Jesus. We want Barnabas not jesus ect ect. Does that mean modern jews are on the hook for it? No he died because of humanity and for humanity.

With that said the parable of the vineyard is more app for modern judaism than any blood libel.

>>17775389
>Does that mean modern jews are on the hook for it?
modern jews aren't the same as biblical jews.
All biblical jews either converted or were slaughtered in 70 AD

>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:

"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)

anti-semites have always been stupid