>>213968582
>the higher barrier in question
your point is obvious but does not account for the reality of open zero-sum imageboard dynamics in a discussion of general quality. if anything the higher barrier results in MORE low quality posts and those that go around it.
>>213968638
>You don't see /lit/ discussing shit like Lord of the Rings
so you've never spent a day on /lit

oh the faggot that bitches non stop from last night is back
shame, threads have been way comfier tonight