Search results for "fadcaf17d7193ba942e7ccb411a9277c" in md5 (6)

/vg/ - /mjg/ - Mahjong General
Anonymous No.542207156
Isn't one of the formulae just better then the others?
/vm/ - /doko/ - Games with Lobbies General
Anonymous No.1904905
>>1904897
Fine... its ok... the easiest way to get good information is to spread misinformation and have others reflexively correct you after all...
/vg/ - /mjg/ - Mahjong General
Anonymous No.534420937
>>534420843
hnnng..... BRAAAAAAAP
/vg/ - /mjg/ - Mahjong General
Anonymous No.532572818
>>532572732
i left first after one game, i didn't realise everyone else did too
/vg/ - /mjg/ - Mahjong General
Anonymous No.530819539
>>530819258
>a minmaxed bot playstyle is actually detrimental to them, while a shitty schizo one is beneficial?
That's literally me. I'm winning more with a 17% deal-in rate in Jade than when I was at 12%. Blindy pushing everything works.
/vg/ - /mjg/ - Mahjong General
Anonymous No.530668504
>>530668094
I didn't say that though. Both high win efficiency and low deal-in loss players can survive in Jade, even if their 1st-4th spread is completely different. It's just that net win efficiency players seem to be better than both.
It's more interesting to see highly aggressive players rank up, as their playstyle goes against conventional wisdowm.