Anonymous
10/9/2025, 11:11:42 PM
No.518629868
[Report]
This is the same doctrine expounded upon by the absolutists:
We are talking about a SOVEREIGN, ABSOLUTE property, that of the unity of the soul over the body, with a capacity to arrange and move the body, or the point in a compass having capacity to draw the boundaries of a circle: sovereignty is that point by which the compass can draw a circle, and make the limits and boundaries of a political body.
Thomas Hobbes
>And though in the charters of subordinate corporations, a corporation be declared to be one person in law, yet the same has not been taken notice of in the body of a commonwealth [state] or city, nor have any of those innumerable writers of politics observed any such union
Hobbes: Independent Absolute State Corporation -- Limited, Subordinate Corporations
>Of Regular, some are Absolute, and Independent, subject to none but their own Representative: such are only Common-wealths [or States]; Of which I have spoken already in the 5. last preceding chapters. Others are Dependent; that is to say, Subordinate to some Soveraign Power, to which every one, as also their Representative is Subject.
>Of Systemes subordinate, some are Politicall, and some Private. Politicall (otherwise Called Bodies Politique, and Persons In Law,) are those, which are made by authority from the Soveraign Power of the Common-wealth. Private, are those, which are constituted by Subjects amongst themselves, or by authoritie from a stranger. For no authority derived from forraign power, within the Dominion of another, is Publique there, but Private.
>In All Bodies Politique [Any Corporation under the State] The Power of The Representative is Limited.
>In Bodies Politique [Subordinate Corporations under the aegis of the State], the power of the Representative is always Limited: And that which prescribes the limits thereof, is the Power Sovereign.
>For Power Unlimited, is absolute Sovereignty. And the Sovereign, in every Commonwealth, is the absolute Representative of all the Subjects.
Anonymous
9/20/2025, 3:29:00 PM
No.516662518
[Report]
>>516658766
By merge of State / Corporate Power, what is actually meant is a Unitary Power like in Hobbes Leviathan: The State as One Personhood.
...Fascism is a Unitary mode of Politics... like the kind espoused in Plato's Republic: The ideal is that the State should act as one entity or one person...
Simply put, Fascism is just a unitary politics, the corporatism (because corporate means 'body' means to 'act as one person or one body').
So Fascism is State Corporatism (where the "corporate power" doesn't just mean a guild system or numerous private corporations -- but the State itself as One Corporate Person)...
...The epitome of the corporate power itself is the One Party State -- before Fascism and multi-party democracies, it was Absolutism and One Royal Estate with pre-eminence over the other estates -- now, instead of estates, it is political parties, and Fascism is the pre-eminence of One Political Party, like one corporate power, over all the others...
That is what Fascism is by 'Corporatism' -- paired with the philosophy of Actual Idealism from Giovanni Gentile.
Anonymous
8/26/2025, 3:42:04 AM
No.513997757
[Report]
>>513987858
>>513988028
You misunderstand Fascism if by "corporate" power you mean myriad private corporations.
...
The corporate power Fascism extols is Leviathan: the State as one personhood. A unitary mode of politics. Where a one-party State rules to make people into one body like a household under one head.
Gentile
>It is the State that possesses a concrete will & must be considered a person.
Giuseppe Bottai
>However, in speaking of the corporative State, it must not be understood as meaning only all that which pertains to the relations between employers and workers – relations based on a principle of collaboration rather than upon a struggle of classes. Fascism with its new arrangements aims at a more complex end. This, summed up in a few words, is "to reassert the sovereignty of the State over those syndicates, which, whether of an economic or social kind, when left to themselves broke out at one time against the State, subjecting the will of the individual to their own arbitrary decision, almost musing the rise of judicial provisions alien to the legal order of the State, opposing their own right to the right of the State, subordinating to their own interests the defenceless classes, and even the general interest, of which the State is naturally the judge, champion and avenger."
Fausto Pitigliani
>That the Corporation has no legal independent personality but is an organ of the State Administration.
>To these organs, which take the name of Corporations and link the various productive activities of the country as members of one body
>The Corporations constitute the unitary organisation of the forces of production and represent all their interests.
>In virtue of this integral representation, and in view of the fact that the interests of production are the interests of the Nation, the law recognises the Corporations as State organs.