>>24559545
While you need external phenomena to reinforce the “magic”, the same way the ancients looking to the night sky saw the stars as the gods, the external phenomena itself isn’t the “magic”. The chemistry in the brain leading up to that perception is. “Magic”. That’s the beauty of it. It’s in the world. It lies within the mind’s eye. Magic is love and appreciation for beauty and mystery. Wonder. It’s the recipe for it. It is what births religion. It is what drives us into the unknown. That sensation a biologist feels when they discover a new form of deep sea life? That’s magic. Even if they don’t use or interpret the word that way. Same as how miracles are magic by any other name. The bishops and priests saw the irony as an okay and accepted one. Even science today is indistinguishable from magic, wizardry, in areas. The wizardly trope or stereotype is built from ancient astrologer-priest and natural philosopher and hermetic alchemist (etc) aesthetics, which all led up to modern day science.
You don’t need much for magic. “I know something you don’t know!”. “I can do something you can’t do!”. The sage is the wizard and the wizard is the magician.