Schopenhauer has insightful thoughts at times, my brothers and sisters do too and they’re retarded. The Schopenhauerfags need to learn what is SYSTEM. The fact that Schopenhauer is readable is actually evidence of his retardation. Heidegger said intelligibility is suicide for philosophy. Check out Fichte’s Grundlage it was written for freshmen.

>>24698404
Kant wasn’t an autist in real life, only in his study. People who met him said he was a charming, even enchanting character.

>>24672873
>muh thing-in-itself
Yes thank you for illustrating my point, this is the issue. For Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and Kant, there is no ding an sich in the sense in which you mean it. How can you have a thing in itself, only problematic for the I, as being a substrate of experience? What is this truth beyond what can be known, yet can be knowing, as “causing” and so on? This is PSEUD SLOP.

>>149678563
Louise swelling up into a big juicy blueberry on the verge of popping

“One of the best objections one could raise against transcendence idealism is as follows: ‘If nature is your own product, then how is it that you are nevertheless able to learn things from nature? If nature is your own product, then how is any research into nature possible? How could you perform any experiments? You must already be acquainted with nature. Therefore, despite what you claim, nature must also contain for you something more, something you did not expect to find. But this is the characteristic feature of ((posited being)). Consequently, you cannot have produced nature.’

Answer: Here we do no more than learn about ourselves and employ our faculty of judgment to analyze what is posited by the imagination. Nature in its entirety is a product of the imagination.”

Top kek this is why Fichte became a footnote, he simply refused to compromise with normie thinking. He’s actually not crazy and if you understand his philosophy that answer makes perfect sense.