>>96362292
>a foe that can transport ships across the galaxy in a matter of, at most, days
In the SW galaxy, not in the 40k galaxy without mapping it first. And assuming that hyperdrives even work in the 40k galaxy. Or that it isn't the same as the warp. Those are fanboy assumptions.
>even with a completely calm Warp, a similar journey from the outer edges of the Milky Way to the core could take years
Nope, it took months. Even less for Chaos marines favoured by the Gods.
>It takes them years to possibly decades to find it
it only takes reading the mind of a prisoner that knows the way.
And "decades" is a lot in SW, but a blink in 40k
>giving the Empire time to both call for reinforcements
what reinforcements if they're busy defending other systems from the Imperium?
If you handwave the political realities of the GE, I can do the same for the Imperium. Except that the Imperium already did it in canon with the Indomitus Crusade fleets thanks to Gulliman authority.
You don't really get the scale of the logistics of the Imperium.
>This is a battle of starfleets, not ground troops
In SW, sure. In 40k, boarding actions are routine.
Lets see a ISD stop not only teleportation attacks, but also trying to stop boarding torpedoes that WILL go through their shields.
And space marines are not the only ones capable of this, btw. Imperial Navy breachers of the Admech also do it.
>>96362318
BDZ fanboy bullshit that magically only happens in tertiallry sources at best. The legacy of that lying shill called Curtis Saxton and stardestroyer.net fanboys.
Meanwhile in real SW battles in the movies, turbolasers are little better than IRL guns. Every time.
And again. ISDs are the backbone and mainstay of the GE fleets, while in 40k terms they're little better than picket ships. And only because their TIE fighter wings and land troops