Welcome to the LEGO General!

>LEGO General Archive:
https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/subject/Lego%20General/

>Retiring Sets Data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rlYfEXtNKxUOZt2Mfv0H17DvK7bj6Pe0CuYwq6ay8WA/

Previously: >>11466992

>Jang isn't going to review the Fire Knight mech despite having an entire channel decidated to Gundam

>Fire Knight mech directly uses techniques present in Cole's Titan Mech which jang called the greatest lego mech ever made and an achievment in design, this set is a continuation of it's design principals

>still isn't reviewing it and gets annoyed when people bring it up in his twitch chat

What the fuck is his problem

Potter has the castles
Jurassic has the dinos
Star Wars has the space
One Piece has the pirates

Suggest an original theme that doesn't overlap with the current loicensed themes

>>11471785
The real question is when will he drop the Harry Potter boycott?

>>11471790
Probably never, JK Rowling has only become more outspokenly and actively anti-trans, I'm suprised lego itself hasn't dropped the theme

I miss when sets that are less than 500 were actually substantial

>>11471778 (OP)
Based

>>11471792
Baseplates go such a long way in being able to represent natural biomes, my favorite kind of set. I get phasing out raised baseplates because despite how good they look I hate how flimsy they are but if they actually end up phasing out normal ones for good like they seem to be trying to then Lego is dead to me and I'll fully making the jump to 3rd parties

>>11471791
>I'm suprised lego itself hasn't dropped the theme
Profits speak higher than virtue signaling

Realistically, what would it take for you to buy the $1000 version?

>>11471806
$1000 dollars

Isn't it crazy to think that after so many years Lego is still using the molds they made for an unlicensed theme for Jurassic Park? I guess that's part of the reason the raptors look so ridiculously oversized, they weren't trying to make them accurate to JP

>>11471806
The concept of a $1000 Lego set disgusts me on a fundamental level. Fans should take a stand and boycott this set it would be nice if a big Lego youtube creator said fuck you to the Lego gibs and started a social media movement hating on it and demanding this to stop.
But of course they are all spineless and too dependent on Lego for their livelyhood. Maybe Jangs video will go viral if he starts crying or something

>>11471788
Greek mythology. Or just make it mythology in general with different popular myths from across the world but problem is they wouldn't dare touch anything biblical

Bonjour!

>>11471830
age of mythology theme, ancient egypt, ancient greek, ancient norse, you could do aztec gods stuff, would be very cool

sadly I think interest in mythology peaked with the percy jackson books, if only the movie series wasn't a total flop we could've maybe got sets from that

How good is 3d printing for Lego accessories/hair pieces?

>>11471833
>>11471835
For shame, he had a perfectly good streak of talking to himself for a dozen posts going and you ruined it by raising the unique poster count from 1.

>>11471835
I made this post >>11471811

I'm from Portugal

>>11471785
jang's busy investing in replacing every single thing in his city with funwholes

>>11471836
Id rather they integrate mythology stuff in an unlicensed fantasy theme

>>11471833
>>11471835
what kind of obsession is this

>>11471855
It's our resident schizo

>>11471806
Daisy Ridley dressed in the Slave Leia outfit giving me a blow job would probably make me consider buying it for $1000.

I mean think about it. Its going to 10,000 grey and black pieces and all the figures are from a New Hope, meaning you probably already have trieples of all of them.
>but new prints and molds!!!
Lego doesnt give a fuck about Star Wars anymore.

>>11471858
Yeah I of kind of struggle to think what they could possibly add that would make it impossible to replicate withour buying the set. How did sets like the big millennium falcon did it?

Lmao at "the people"(the schizo samefagging) doubting I'm from Portugal in the other thread. What should I do? Post the label of a kitchen item in portuguese? Lmao

>>11471872
timestamp it faggot

>>11471872
At least you’re not spelling it scizo anymore.

>>11471874
I hope you're proud of having stolen a minute out of my life I'll never get back

We need an echo the dolphin theme. Who's with me?

Just post the Dolphin Pussy image already.

We need a Castlevania theme. Who's with me?

Begos! Me and my begos having fun together forever so much love and happiness playing

We need a Coolspot theme. Who's with me?

>>11471836
Too much room for muh cultural appropriation misrepresenting non-western cultures etc etc.
Even Bionicle caught flack from taking from Polynesian myth

>>11471778 (OP)
Hey anons who went to Legoland in Denmark, i have a question: Can you buy single minifigures there? Like Joker, Darth Vader, Indiana Jones ETC. I'm going to Billund soon so I wanna know

>>11471788
How about horror icon sets? Say Dracula's castle or Frankenstein's laboratory

>>11471863
The big $800 one? I think it sold well but not fast enough or enough units compared to the $160 one.

>>11471931
Oh shit you mentioned castles...

>>11471888
>Label also in Spanish
Nice try. Spaniard.

>>11471900
We need Sega themes that are not just Sonic. That's what I hate about modern Sega, all they do is Monkey Ball, Sonic, and Yakuza.

>>11471931
Potter is about a witches in giant gothic haunted castle

>>11471934
Imagine

>>11471932
Yeah but, what was in it that was truly exclusive? Besides the slight variations in minifig prints

>>11471872
The schizo can't be convinced of anything that he didn't think of himself. Best to call him a retarded faggot and move on.

I genuinely don't think there's a reality where Lego can feasibly make a Pokemon theme that will make people happy

>>11471958
Lego fans are never happy, but they still buy the things they hate.

I posted my MGS1 collection here a while back, anyway I remade my Vulcan Raven to be smaller, and more importantly WAY more sturdy, this guy won't fall apart at the slightest touch

>>11471970

Do you hide your Lego hobby from your parents/family/friends or is it something you have no issue publicly acknowledging?

>>11471811
I blocked this from my memory

>>11471983
They created this monster wdym?

>>11471830
A CMF line of Greek Mythology would be neat, like they've already done Poseidon(Ocean King) and Athena(Battle Goddess), seeing the rest of the Olympians would be great.

>cmfs have 12 figs
>12 Olympians
A no brainer

>>11471811

>>11472015
Ackshually there's usually 13/14 Olympians

Hades is left out of the classical 12 and Dyonisus only came later, Hestia used to be in his spot.

Having 12 would mean leaving out two of those. I don't think anyone gives a shit about Hestia but leaving out either Hades or Dyonisus would make people mad

1. Zeus
2. Hera
3. Poseidon
4. Demeter
5. Athena
6. Hermes
7. Ares
8. Hephaestus
9. Apollo
10. Artemis
11. Aphrodite
12. As you can see there's only one slot left

>>11472019
I hate those overdesigned molds

>>11472015
>>11472011
They’ve been doing a Greek or Roman in just about every other CMF are you retards or just children?
>>11471206

What would your ideal Lego play room look like? Would you rather play on the floor(carpet) or a table? Sitting down doesn't seem very conducive to play... Maybe a standing desk? What if you put a rug on the desk to make it fluffy?

>>11472028
Maybe they could still do Hades, just make him generic, like a mean face and plain brown like a robe.
And maybe there could be a follow up set of the Greek heroes?
1. Hercules (obviously)
2. Jason
3. Argonaut (for army building)
4. Perceus
5. Achilles
6. Odysseus
7. Theseus
8. Icarus (really only famous for the name)
But that's as many as I can think of. Were there notable villains that could maybe round out the line up?

>>11472035
Bellerophon, Pelops (really more a victim than a hero but whatever works), Orpheus, Oedipus. Probably a few more that I'm not remembering either.

>>11471788
Trains

>>11472035
Also, why is it that everyone always forgets that Hades is supposed to have the Cap of Invisibility? It's literally to him what Poseidon's trident or Zeus' thunderbolts are to them.
Actually, here's a thought: fully transparent invisible Hades, with a unique moulded cap and light printing.

>>11472028
>>11472035
Bunch of generic dudes in togas with just a couple accessories to symbolize what they are, lame.

The cool Greek stuff lies on the bestiary and they've already done most of the cool humanoids. Cyclops, centaurs, Medusa, harpies, Minotaur, satyrs... All done

It's not like they can CMFy a hydra or a manticore or Scylla or Cerberus

>>11472034
When I get around to make a Lego room it's gonna have a large, nearly wall to wall, rug(easier to clean/wash than carpet), a shelf for the few things I wanna display, a desk for building, lots and lots of transparent drawers for MOC pieces and a small table for photography(might experiment with printing a bunch of landscapes to use as backgrounds)

>>11471900
AS much as I shouldn't engage with licenseeposting, and I don't know how an Ecco theme would work, Ecco is one of SEGA's most based franchises so I'd be game to see them try and make it work.

>>11471806
Someone paying me more than $1,000, I guess. Or for D*sney to sell the property and the new owner to disavow all the mouseslop. Zero interest in this franchise with the Rat's claws in it.

>>11472053
Unbelievable disrespect for Blacktron 2 and Space Police 3. Also, Hydronauts but no Aquanauts, Sharks, Singrays or Raiders? Come on now.

>>11471853
I hate that this theme happened during my dark age

>>11472070
Blacktron 2 minifigs are awful. Sets blow Blacktron 1's out of the water but the white and giant dorky "B" took one of the sleekest designs lego has ever done and ruined it. SP3 aliens are great but I find the humans in post LoM themes pretty bad overall, either too bland like MM or SP3 or annoyingly bright like AC and GS. List only had Hydronauts but I would say only the Stingrays are above B, I think these guys are S tier and among the best minifig designs lego ever did. Their helmets are one of my favorite headpieces, extremely underrated mold.

>>11471983
Yes, actually. Thankfully I live alone so it's never really an issue. Got nothing on display so even bringing people over is fine

Will you buy the beautiful hibiscus?

>>11471806
Winning the lottery

SciFi mixed with fantasy(a la 40k) has so much potential as an idea it's astounding how bad nexo knights turned out. I hope one day they take another crack at the concept(but not as a nexo remake)

>>11471918
I aspire to be this

Anyone have a online store on bricklinks? I have been looking at some side income, alot of store don't sell for weeks/months but I mean I would be in a saturated market with same common pieces as everyone else, which I am okay with since I wont have to constantly keep track while I have my main job.

If selling is too slow than I anticipated should I consider selling pieces on ebay?

>>11471798
What is going on here? This set is practically nothing. 2 BURPs, a rope bridge piece and a half-assed shack. Embarrasing pine trees but also a good 4x4 with boat.
Yet, I look at it and FUCKING NEED THIS!

>>11471788
loicensed? more like soicensed

>>11471872
is this Tiago?

>>11472034
Freestanding table in the middle you can walk around for large projects. Smaller desk at the wall with sorting drawers in range for tinkering. Shelves on the opposing wall for completed models.

>>11471928
Guys?

>>11471928
>>11472235
>please help us in our market research
>guys
>please

>>11471928
I remeber only keychains but it was 15 years ago and I was a kid, kind of blurry memories from it.
I bought the Star Wars Sandcrawler there and turned it into a mega tank

>>11471983
I have little sets on display in my bedroom and they saw sets coming in the mail and they had no issues.
They have been complaining about my old sets in boxes taking room in the garage, I'll take them with me when I go live by myself and then decide what to do with them, old star wars, city, agents, Indiana jones

>>11472241
I'm serious dude
>>11472242
That's gay

>>11472136
No

>>11471983
Nope, never did. Found a cool asian gf who is into lego, she hot too. Life's good.

>>11472285
hi jang

>>11472288
Not cool his wife died show some respect.

>>11471928
Can you get into the vault and get my white whale , only one boxed copy of it exists in entire world.
Not the partial access vault but the deep long term storage vault.

>>11471983
The more people I meet the more I find out they have videogame/toy hobbies. Some mid 50s guy and his wife walked into my shop today looking for Lego and talking about how he just needs to find a few more Batman sets for himself. His wife didn't even look at him wrong or like disappointed, she was all giddy and happy about his hobby.

>>11471778 (OP)
BRING IT BACK

>>11472345
>Flakes from wear in your path

>>11471811
because these are literally +the+ best lego dinosaurs.
They are like horses or sharks. "the lego dinosaur"
Why they should update them? They are awesome on their own.
And lego makes new JW-dinos as we see.

>>11472380
Their scale is beyond ridiculous for what they are supposed to be. Pic related is infinitely more appropriate. Shame the lack of articulation

They are doing an amazing job avoiding THE leak. I for one am excited for the shitstorm

>>11472450
>french filename
WELL WELL WELL

>>11472452
>Mandr and Solidbrix soifacing and dickriding it as the best thing ever
>Tiago praises it but laments the price
>Jang trashes it relentlessly but his video only gets 10 views

>>11472452
Thousand-Dollar Lego Set
did you ever wonder... "how can I tell people I'm a rich douche bag, without having to speak any words?"

you get the full experience as the Lego employee escorts this 50 pound monster out to your luxury vehicle through the mall on the push cart. (a free service with the purchase.) I parked over by the left side... ooops sorry I usually do, but today I parked on the right side of the mall (enjoy the full lap around the mall, so everyone can SEE you bought the $1K Lego set!)

it won't be so impressive inside your house, since it's already huge and full of rich douche bag items. but boy will that walk through the mall be a memorable moment! be sure to soak it in, you earned it!

wait why did eldorado retire what the fuck

>>11472471
It ran for a couple years what did you expect

I think a bit of a missing genre on YouTube is people improving/reimagining old sets.
"Set ______, watch me make it better using only pieces that existed at the time"
"We all loved set _______, I'm gonna make it even more awesome without adding no more than __ pieces"
"Modernizing set _______"

>>11472474
No it didn’t. It released July 2023 and retired December 2024 that’s just a little over one year meanwhile that fugly 400 dollar castle has been on the market for years piratebros we lost

>>11472479
that concept is super-niche

most people want "EXACTLY as Lego did, must be perfection since they sold it that way, and any alteration is blasphemy!"
or
"I built this amazing unique thing, all my own. different than the thing Lego did!"

I can maybe see modernizing old sets with new pieces, since there's tons of new curves and what-not. but even then, people will scream the old set was "soul" and the new pieces destroy it blah-blah (just expected speculation)

Lego itself has modernized a few sets

>>11472479
For sure. That was actually a big part of the appeal of older sets. They were begging to be added on to in a way that a lot of modern sets are not

>>11472483
Did your wife's boyfriend gift you that?

>>11471983
No, my parents and friends know about it. It's fairly mainstream to collect vintage stuff and Lego markets their products to adults on nostalgia and as a "puzzle / craft / hobbyist" type toy with their flowers, architecture, etc models.

I wouldn't take a first date back to my place and showing her the 100+ sets I have on display or lead with it in a conversation, but after I get to know someone, I like sharing my interests. My girlfriend and I build sets together and out of my 5 coworkers, 4 of them also have Lego and we're all in our 30s. I gave out citizenbrick figs at Christmas for work and everyone thought they were amazing.

When I was a teenager / young adult, I would try and hide it and even feel embarrassed in the toy aisle, but now it feels like a societally acceptable adult hobby and now that all the people that grew up playing with Lego are now adults.

>>11472501
There is a prominent lego YouTuber who proudly declares that he doesn’t “”mod”” his sets. And hearing him say that actually caused me physical pain.

>>11472471
>>11472493
that's only because they made a lot of castles and they didn't sell. people bought the pirate set, so now it's gone.

try and find the small new Johnny Thunder set. you can't, they sold the amount they made already.

as far as I can tell, Lego does NOT continually make things. they set the machines up, make X amount of a set to fill the warehouse, and reset the machine for the next thing.

maybe there are some exceptions where they didn't expect to sell so many of something, and they re-run something (Lego Movie 1 sets vanished and needed restocking?) but they have so many new things to make, stopping the machines to re-make something is double-costly for them since it now stops the new thing from being sold on time.

>>11471983
Do I hide it? No. But I like to keep it contained to one room. I have no problem telling people I like lego and have a large, decades-old collection. But only if it comes up organically in conversation. I see a lot of people displaying lego sets throughout living spaces these days and while I think that’s fine, it’s not my style. I will comment on itand say it looks nice. But, I don’t do that in my own home. that said, I don’t have my usual lego room right now. It was too expensive to have a room dedicated to Lego so it went into storage and now I have roommates. So maybe the display people have it figured out more than me.

I’m not normally a nostalgiafag but the new pirates minifigures are actually really uninteresting looking compared to the OGs

>>11472523
Pointless post with any concrete evidence

>>11472479
Didn't know if this autism was excusive to me or not. I mostly collect pre 2000s sets and while I like modding them using elements created after the set released never sits well with me. The only person I have ever found who does this kind of this is this guy who seems to only do SW shit, not into licensed themes but it's kind of neat seeing him recreate modern sets with only old pieces.
https://m.youtube.com/@classicbrix

>>11472510
It all depends on the market, they will make new versions of sets that they sell through the initial batch due to demand. For the most part most of the non-IP sets are evergreen, however if they include certain molds that aren't readily available they can become a more limited run. Also cost to market comes into play, they won't go through the effort to make any more of that set in particular when they can reuse the red panda mold and sell it in a 40$ set Dreamzzz. There is also no aftermarket demand for that set either, you can literally buy it NIB for $5.
Ideas in particular are generally created and sold out as is, for the most part the demand doesn't warrant needing to make any more except in certain cases, Central Perk for example.
Some even end up with different SKUs and branding, Disney 100.

>>11471806
Nothing and this is coming from a huge fan of the original film.

>>11471806
If it was 50% off I would. But really I just don’t see the appeal. If I was to spend $1000 on lego in one day I would probably get a bunch of different sets.

>>11471798
Lego expanding the color pallet was a mistake

Do modern greys/white still yellow over time?

>>11472103
You missed out. Fortunately most of the minifigures and accessories are cheap on BL and easy to mass. And the sets, while soulful don’t do anything revolutionary design wise. You can moc stuff for it easily with the right colors. And it was the brittle brown era so you’re better off sometimes using new parts. The orc ship and the skelly ship are pretty incredible though. If those are the only sets you buy you’ll be pleased

>>11472110
This is one of the most underrated factions outside of the bull knights from Kingdoms

>>11471853
Fantasy era 2 came to me in a dream. It’s happening (real)

>>11472662
The new 3 and 1 and the prize machine show they are planning on doing more human factions so dont count on fantasy asides from the odd mage and dragon here and there

>>11472662
>>11472681
is it too late for them to get away with pink white & light blue themed faction? maybe a rainbow? would they be like... seahorse faction?

I know they are doing [IP name removed] rip-off unicorn castle, but that has no minifigs or faction shields or anything

kidding aside, I like the idea of NEW factions rather than re-doing the old ones.

>>11472690
I'm all for new factions but having orcs and elves and dwarves and undead would truly take things to the next level

>>11472727
elves are the only thing really missing from the original run. I’m fully aware we’ve had some cmf elves that were from that faction but I see that more as a supplement than an official faction addon

lego

>>11471918
based begos poster is the best soul on /lg/

Suggest some subthemes for Lego City. Anything that isn't contemporary is off limits.

I think a coastal theme would be cool. Theyve done some underwater and artic stuff but I think it would be cool to have like a simple lighthouse, baywatch-type beach, fishing boat, some bungalows, coast guard, paragliders, maybe a cruise ship to balance out all the cargo ones we had

>>11472776
Middle eastern or Ukrainian warfare

>>11472776
City Archaeology and paleontologist. Researchers on digsite ruins

>>11472776
City Archaeology and paleontology Researchers on digsite ruins. Egypt, Greek, Mayan... Think adventurers but modern and less actiony

>>11472534

>>11472799
OTHER ANON IN ABSOLUTE SHAMBLES

>>11472799
Was just hoping you would just point out what makes the old ones superior. They both seem pretty generic too me, though I do have a soft spot for the eyes withput the white dot
If anything sets like Barracuda Bay(modern) offer some more interesting variations

>>11472839
And since I have no problem backing things up I was for instance referring to the shirtless guy with tats and the shepirates

>>11472842
Well, first off, women in a pirate crew as anything other than random kidnapped whores is kinda cringe.
Second, is that supposed to be melanoma on the left one's face, or some kind of revitiligo cripplefaggot thing, or what?

>>11472503
Parents got them for me.

>>11472452
All Lego "leaks" are intentional

>>11472452
>$1000 for this
OH NO NO NO MOUSESISTERS

The new death star is gonna be amazing yall poors are gonna be sour grape coping so hard

>>11472889
>yall
Hello fellow transsister

If this piece of crap is $500 I don't see how doubling it will get you a sufficiently substantial death star

>>11472900
oh damn that is some serious logically derived dread. there is no hope for the $1K Death Star

>>11472465
Jang loves the godawful $800 falcon

https://youtu.be/tNl21ApeZJk?si=zExgGgd0HTm37BXo

Knowing how he's like today it's bizarre to see how positive and enthusiastic he used to be

>The Enterprise D will have printing for its windows, NCC registry, Name and the minifigures will all have printed arms.

November can't get here fast enough for me boys.

>>11472900
>doubling it
How optimistic

>>11472940
WAOWIE, I can't hecking wait to consoom more [PRODUCT], don't you agree, fellow consumers? We should all go out and buy more [PRODUCT]!

When Fantasy Castle returns will it be focused on named characters or will it be like before with kino nameless soldiers

>>11472971
It's not gonna return

I can’t wait for all the stories of people trying to display the new Death Star but it’s too fucking big or heavy for the shelf and it fell off and smashed.

>>11472955
Imagine unironically posting that in a /lg/ thread lol, faggot.

I'm kinda hoping it has a fully covered exterior and it opens dollhouse style

Not that I'm gonna buy it, would just be neat to see

>>11473040
lol making Star Wars fans buy a dollhouse

"nuh-uh! it's not a dollhouse!"

>>11473074
Literally castlefags

When will 3d printing make Lego obsolete?

>>11473113
If there's no LEGO engraved on the studs there's a great portion of the population that wont want it no matter what

>>11473113
The moment you stop spamming this?

>>11473074
That wouldn't embarrass mousecucks. It's Didney Wars, they're already paying top dollar for a "lifestyle brand" whose target demographic is women. They already buy the Baby Yeed purses, the Force Is Female T-Shits, the #Resistance bumper stickers. Why would they balk at a $1000 dollhouse?

>check ebay for a set I want hoping to get a good deal
>all US listing are 50% lower than RRP
>all EU listings are 20% higher than RRP
I hate this continent so much it's unreal.

>>11472849
No, it's just dirt, grime, or gunpowder. It's only on one face as well; the face on the reverse side is clean.

>>11471778 (OP)
Why do we have another thread? This one with new format for OP is great, why the need to make a shitty one that uses racial slurs? We really had some great threads with the new format...

>>11473233
Bwahahahaha! Bonjour mon ami!

>>11473243
You are mentally ill fag

>>11473233
>shitty one
>that uses racial slurs
Pick one and only one faggot

>>11473254
Both

>>11473250
Hates >Racial slurs
Loves >homophobic slurs
Kek. We’ve told you to mix up how you speak and you just can’t.

Apparently someone posted a picture of the black pearls hull, then deleted it. Anyone see or save it?

>>11473121
He keeps spamming this to save the Lego Company. Thank you Anon...

Hopes for lego pokemon?

>>11473297
Hope it flops and they drop it

>>11473297
18+ buildable Pikachu without minifigs. Fuck you.

>>11473268
Well he has fag-word privileges after all, what with his diseased prolapsed rectum from constant bottoming for HIV-positive africans.

>>11473303
that already exists.
you can go buy it. right now!
it even runs! when you turn the crank!

>>11473297
it seems impossible for Lego to do anything different or "better" than what Mega Bloks has already done. [yeah yeah THING and THING LEGO!]

except for minifigs and tiny molded Pokemon in the Lego "style". that's the only thing LEGO "can" do with Pokemon. anything else already exists.

Gingerbread

>>11473321
The white pattern makes it look like he has a massive cock.

>>11473329
H-hot

>>11473321
Great, now I wanna get the Light side Vader from the Falcon along with this one for a full line up.

>>11473321
the leak said the AT-AT was $80 with only that one Vader

Lego was absolutely idiots for not including a gingerbread snowtrooper and gingerbread imperial officer, and a gingerbread rebel snow guy, for army-building wackos to buy multiple $80 sets

even 4 minifigs in an $80 set is too low. ONE is like a slap in the face.

>>11473338
>$80 AT-AT
Wew, that will be tiny as shit. It will probably be a midi scale one. Would be surprised if it even fits one minifig inside.

>>11473341
it's a display piece Xmas decoration, not a set to put figures in. there's no pics yet but that's what I'm expecting

>>11473344
Eh, makes sense, considering we're getting a playscale AT-AT next year anyway.

Pic related is most certainly testing the waters for the Pokemon theme. Mark my words.

>>11473358
The seething would be glorious

>>11472900
I think the price on this ship is also all the alien head molds. There will be nothing in the DS that hasnt already been molded 1000 times.

>>11473365
>I think the price on this ship is also all the alien head molds.
The price is on the fans willingness to pay for it, nothing else

They better not ruin the Death Star with return of the jedi slop. It needs to be Star Wars(1977) only

>>11471806
>you just know
Nothing would even though I rewatched the OT last week and was reminded how great it is (especially the first movie). 1000 is ridiculous even by modern lego UCS crap standards.

>>11473358
yep

the leaker guy said it's the same designers, so you can already get a sense of what they will look like (and used this Fortnite set as an example)

that Toothless in green would look pretty close to a Bulbasaur

Judging by how pitiful the interior of the UCS $800 falcon is I really wouldn't get my hopes for a Death on this level, they will probably dump the majority of the pieces on rounding out the exterior

Why didn't you buy it? Do you hate fun? Do you hate soul? Do you hate supporting classic unlicensed themes?

And now because of you the only pirates we're ever gonna get are of the Caribbean and One Piece. Good job faggot

>>11473396
More like instead of using 2x4 bricks they'll make the whole superstructure out of 1x2 plates
If the cantina was anything to go by

>>11472194
you could mass sell them to a store for like half off market average

>>11473401
I did buy it. Also ordered the Tortuga set from Bricklink and have the Barracuda. Unfortunately, you are probably right and we won't see anymore pirate sets that aren't licensed

Oops posted this in the Star Wars general instead of here

I wanna get into Legos again and really want some Lego clone troopers. What's a good set to get?

>>11473475
depends on what kind you want, i like this
if you want a good build the at te walker is cool. if you like clone wars style, you could wait for the mtt that's releasing in a few months

>>11473475
>>11473491
buying used will save you money, you can look on bricklink and find a store selling a set you like as well as individual troopers

>>11473491
>>11473494
Thanks I'll look into the at te and used sets. Didn't even think about that.

>>11471983
I don't hide it in the sense of it being only in secret and not at all visible in my house but I don't talk about it much with some friend groups or with my colleagues. I have other more socially acceptable and less autistic hobbies.

>>11472940
I will never buy it since it's basically confirmed there aren't interiors but I'm just courious since people have been asking for Lego Star Trek since forever

I caved and got the DUNC set at target for $131.99 - 5% target card discount.

Do you think there will ever be more DUNC sets? A sandworm maybe when the third movie comes out

>>11473557
they could do alot, (plenty of awesome scenes in God Emperor) but it's definitely not as sellable as Star Wars. The audience is more niche and kids don't have the patience for it.

I'd like a diorama of the fight at the end of the second part in the throne room.

>>11472510
SOULLESS

Dnd was the closest thing we will ever get to another round of fantasy castle

>>11473376
all of the stuff that happens on the death star in rotj is kino

>>11473401
Too 'spensive and I hate greeblized build-a-baseplates. If it brings you any consolation I do regret it.

>>11473475
>>11473491
Faggot mousecuck.

>>11473622
Not the Creator Dragon? Not the Creator Haunted Mansion? Not the multiple Creator castles?

Fucking retard.

>>11473631
There's some dumb plot stuff in a few other parts of rotj but you could instantly improve it by changing all of the endor bullshit

>>11473329
This would not be lore accurate. When Vader burned alive his dick melted and his balls exploded

>>11473631
Drink bleach

>>11473401
I have the original, and instead bought Viking Village which was far better in both aesthetics and price value.If I ever really want it after it retires, I'll buy a fake clone of it for half the price.

>>11473074
Lego sets with minis are already just mini doll houses, retard. The biggest problem with Star Wars fans is all the display shit that exists just to sit there. Dollhouses are at least toys, not just models for the uncreative and untalented. To contrast it, I had rich friends as a kid who had the first dollhouse style deathstar or the modular city buildings, but literally nobody I knew had any of those pathetic pure display sets until a few years ago, and they're all adults. Not to mention that sw fans have allowed lego to turn even things that should be playsets into overpriced displays, look at the trash of pic related, it cost nearly as much as the 09 battle of endor set which was two speeders, the bunker, a walker, and 12 minis
No set should be $1000 (no set should be $200) but a dollhouse would be infinitely better than another fucking UCS ornament.

this goes for non-mousecucks too btw, you are a tremendous faggot if you bought the Titanic or Endurance

>>11473636
>No figs, no castle, just a fantasy creature, like saying
>Not in the slightest related to medieval high fantasy
>Castle with no fantasy elements, castle that predates dnd set/cmfs. Even then a dragon does not fantasy era make. That's like saying 80s/90s castle is fantasy era because there were a dragons and wizard and ghosts
Why are you fuckers so bad faith? It's not like you are actually this dumb

>>11473401
>Female imperial officers
When Lego is so pozzed it flips back to being based

>>11473643
He’s right though. The Luke Vader Emperor section of the movie is top tier storytelling. The rest of the movie not so much.

>>11473656
>The Luke Vader Emperor section of the movie is top tier storytelling
Lmao

Hey guys should I buy 852001 the Lego castle chess set from my brother for £80? It’s new and never been used either.

>>11471830
>mythology in general

like Monke Kid?

It seems we will get more movie cars next year for Speed Champions, hopes?

>>11473664
>Postmodern journey to the west
That's your interpretation of "mythology in general?"

And update on black pearl

>>11473637
the whole movie is a total schlockfest but the final confrontation with the emperor is great. I liked it a lot more as a kid but I can still appreciate the cool stuff in it
>>11473643
did you forget to dilate today xir?

>>11473673
Friendly reminder Barracuda Bay was $200

>>11473680
10 years ago anon, prices have gone up since then

>>11473657
>it is silly that you like that
Okay. So what do you like?

>>11473687
>10 years ago
No

I’m surprised the Jurassic Park license is still a thing. Are people buying it?

>>11473669
if they did an A-Team Van, they would need to include the whole team.

K.I.T.T. is almost guaranteed if we're doing 80's movies. they don't even need to update the minifig it's already perfect

dare I hope for Baby from Supernatural? it's cool if they do just Dean, even though they should include Sam as well. that show has zillions of loyal fans who would snatch that up

>>11473692
They keep pumping out movies

>>11473692
>>11473698
Jurassic. Park will keep making movies constantly, there will always be something coming out. it's the reason they've stretched it out as long as they did

that way they get to "own" DINOSAURS the same way Disney "owns" fairy tales like Snow White and Cinderella.

>>11473689
It was 10 years ago anon...

>>11473705
It's a 2020 set. Are we in 2030 and I didn't even notice?

>>11473692
Boys love dinos, anon. It's never going away unless they pump the water supply full of estrogen.

>>11473714
I'm a estrogenated feminine gay and I love dinos anon

>>11473673
I'm really looking forward to the reveal, given how far Lego knocked the ball out of the park for the updated Barracuda design. My only wish is that it won't have a ridiculously tall aftercastle like every other Lego pirate ship, including their first Black Pearl design. It's very clear in the movies that the ship has a race-built design. That being said, I probably won't buy it though since I already built MOC your brick's GOAT Black Pearl design (pic related), but I hope it'll still be comparable in aesthetics.

>>11473714
I agree mostly. Dinosaurs toys I get. But Jurassic Park as an IP? I don’t. The very first one is the only good movie. The first reboot they did a decade ago was I guess good enough for the masses and financially successful. I somewhat get that. But Nobody goes to the movies anymore and by and large people don’t like the last 3 or 4 or however many were made since then. There’s really only so much you can do with the franchise and what little they have done is tired. I guess it makes some slight sense if the movies are just expensive ads for legos. Just feels like a waste though. Like I’d love to see some Dinos from other IPs or ideally some original unlicensed theme. I know all mega corporations care about is brand recognition but surely the last two decade of lazily rehashed flops from hollywood and shelf warmer toys must mean something to bean counters. I don’t know. Reply with STOP to unsubscribe to my blog

>>11473717
What that anon has on mind is a bit different than you wanting to have sex with yoshi

>>11473717
Furries aren't human and don't factor into the equation.

>>11473729
>The very first one is the only good movie.
Star Wars also has this problem but you see this very thread wall to wall with cucks lining up to pay $1000 for the newest grey sphere. Cool dinos and films that are dumb fun enough to keep kids engaged will see JP live eternally.

>>11473729
Jurassic Park as a Dinosaur IP has things going for it that others can't match

it happens during today-times, around people we can connect with because it's US

any science inaccuracy (did dinosaurs really have feathers? were Raptors really that big?) can be explained away since they dinosaurs in JP are manipulated tech copies

dinosaurs from different eras can interact with eachother

who doesn't love a theme park? (okay maybe that's just for the first movie)

>>11473740
Funny how things work out
>Jurassic Park found an audience of 8 year old boys despite the creator’s intended audience being adults
>Meanwhile Star Wars found its audience of 30+ year old men despite being originally being made for children.

>>11473740
The grey sphere is from the first movie lol

>Inb4 empirefags trying to claim it's better than the original, inevitable considering some of you morons are even trying to defend fucking rotj

>>11473740
90% of those are literally Paul sameniggering.
>>11473749
Don't be shitty, all three are fine films. I'm more concerned about the types that defend prequelslop, doubly so when they get all Rick and Morty pseudo-intellectual about it.

>>11473752
>Don't be shitty, all three are fine films.
Opinion discarded. Next you'll tell me Return of the King is better than Fellowship.

>>11473754
>p-please participate in my faggy little argument about WHICH ONE DA BEST, I'm so lonely and desperate for conflict!
Literally the one thing I care about less than your terrible opinion is your approval.

>>11473754
>thinks a film is fine
>must therefore think a film is as good as another
NTA and RotJ is way worse than the og movie but something being worse than something else doesn't make it bad. At least you're based enough to recognise that empire is not as good as the first movie

>>11473747
>Jurassic Park found an audience of 8 year old boys despite the creator’s intended audience being adults
You cannot be this retarded. Jurassic Park was always meant for children.

>>11473669
I've been hoping for this. Now as long as it has flight conversion it's a total win. They already have the designs to do it too.

>>11473760
So you never read the book. Got it

>>11473766
Oh don't say that as if that's something you would reasonably expect from the average person who's seen the movie.

>>11473766
We're obviously talking about the film, not the book. Kids weren't going nuts over dinosaurs because of the Crichton novels, but because of Spielberg's action flick which didn't even address some of Crichton's commentary like anti-globalization.

>>11473754
>Next you'll tell me Return of the King is better than Fellowship.
Return of the King is the weakest of the film trilogy and it still mogs every other fictional license in Lego's current catalog.

>>11473475
>>11473498
The clone and droids battlepack posted here >>11473491 is the best battlepack to release in years and is always on sale on Amazon. The AT-TE is also a very good design and you can fill it up with the generic white phase 2 clones from the battlepack. Those are definitely the best two clone sets available right now. If you want the 501st specifically, you can make a pretty significant 501st squad using the 501st specialist battlepack (also on sale for like $16 everywhere) and the two basic 501st clones from the Mandalorian show speeder set, and you can get a pretty good Captain Rex from the Rex microfighter set which should be <$7 most places now.

>>11473669
It says DMC Delorean though. This might just be a Delorean and not the BTTF Delorean. The Icons set only calls it Time Machine.

>>11473775
I’m the one who posted >>11473747 and I was specifically referencing the book. Hence
>creator(singular)’s intended audience being adults
I realize that could be taken a few ways but I meant the author that originally made the IP. The book. If I were to say
>the creator of Star Wars
I wouldn’t be talking about JJ Abrams in spite of the fact that he did create the last Star Wars movie. I would probably be talking about the retired George Lucas. I was just making a funny observation I wasn’t trying to start an argument please everyone stop fighting

>>11473775
>Jurassic Park found an audience of 8 year old boys despite the creator’s intended audience being adults
>You cannot be this retarded. Jurassic Park was always meant for children.
You literally jumped to conclusions and yet he's the retarded one? It's fine to at first assume people are talking about the movies only but the moment he mentions how it was meant for adults surely you should be able to put 1+1 together that he was talking about the book instead of assuming he's stupid enough to think spielberg wasn't pandering to kids

>>11473796
> put 1+1 together
Two!

>>11473673
>Pintel but no Ragetti
what the hell were they thinking? At least this will actually have Barbossa, I think previous leaks indicated he was going to be excluded

>>11473816
>what the hell where they thinking?
About how you'll have to buy the next $400 POTC set just to complete the pair, you dumb gullible goyim sheeple.
I mean, I'm assuming that was the line of thought there.

>>11473787
Why does Marty have full-sized legs?
>>11473679
Yeah but the other schlock in that movie is at least entertaining whereas most of the endor stuff drags on and on and on, even the action scenes on endor are dull and prolonged

>>11473747
To quote an obese hack who sold his legacy into the grave for a quick buck:
>it's like poetry, it rhymes

>>11471778 (OP)
I'm a banana!

>>11473749
>The grey sphere is from the first movie lol
Anon's claim is that nobody should want anything Jurassic Park because the later films are bad. If this logic is applied to Star Wars, then no one should want anything from A New Hope either, even if it was good.

Lightning McQueen Speed Champions set

>>11473852
Full january list

>>11473852
Cropping out the soijak costs you nothing.

>>11473844
I wish Lego’s cmf costumes were more like this instead of the open facehole

>>11473857
Lego's method is better because it upsets furries

>>11473858
i'm a fruity

>>11473749
IV>II>VI>V=III>I

>>11473857
Could care less about the bananas and hotdog type shit but so much that for the animals costumes. We could have a massive selection of incredibly useful humanoid animal characters by now instead of the stupid costume shit no one cares about.

>"But if you use that one head it looks like a cutesy animal with a gaping mouth of scary teeth xD"
Die

>>11473860
VI>III>IV>V>I>II

>>11473860
Star Wars(I don't acknowledge title revisionism) > Empire > Return > if you think there's any merit to III over the rest of the prequel(and sequel) GARBAGE you should slit your wrists

It's really good, just not $360 good

>>11473878
>thinking you know better than George

>>11473883
Lion Knights Castle is better

>>11473878
That’s Attack of the Clones I have in second place not Revenge of the Sith. That’s near the bottom.
>sequels
I didn’t rate Disney Wars at all

>>11473890
Lol

No

>>11473893
lol yes and it's not even close

>>11473883
Surprised I haven’t seen even a single person fix that ruined tower. That’s the first thing I would do if I got the set.

>>11473892
Wasn't talking about you, actually liking II tells me you're either baiting or braindead so whatever, but there's a tremendous amount of people who genuinely think "yeah the prequels aren't great but actually revenge of the sith ia pretty good!"

>>11473895
Enjoy playing dolls with your queen sleeping and cooking and dinning

>>11473892
That’s by far the worst Lucas SW movie, the other prequels are not good but they are far better than attack of the clones.

>>11473898
>>11473878
Based tbdesu

>>11473900
>Enjoy playing
Yes anon, that’s what toys are for. And the best castle subthemes were always the ones with some domesticity like fantasy era or pre-knights kingdom classic. That set sucks because it’s ridiculously expensive and big, imagine criticising a Lego set because it’s designed to be played with

>>11473900
Anon these are both """adult""" $300+ sets. No one is "playing" with them. Their merits are based on looks more than anything. And for the record, the bridge and trap door to the dungeon is more fun than anything in the D&D set. Plus, it's a castle, fuck you expect? It's a glorified home.

>>11473878
>I don't acknowledge title revisionism
Oh you're one of those RLM faggots

>>11473906
Are you okay? The DnD set is literally the definition of play. As in actually going on an adventure not taking a dump in the castle toilet after having your meal

>>11473898
>trolling or braindead
Attack of the Clones is a fascinating movie that I love. The sound design is the greatest of any movie ever. The visuals are a hot mess. The dialogue is unintentionally hilarious. The premise is fun and it exposes Lucas as an autistic weirdo. It’s an incredible view into the mind of Lucas. And some parts of it are actually good. I can’t help but have fun every time I watch it. Which is the ultimate point of movies and not something I can say about all other Lucas movies sans the original, which is on top because it does nearly everything Attack of the Clones does, but better.

>>11473911
>muh heckin RLM (whatever the hell that is)
I'd be much more impressed by your 2cool4u faggotry if that wasn't the guaranteed canned NPC response anytime a prequel kiddy feels like his shitty taste is being attacked.

>>11473912
What are the play functions integrated into the DnD set? A blank, noninteractive canvas is not "play" friendly anymore than a baseplate is.

>>11473911
please don’t make fun of me I have so little

>>11473914
It's a really terrible movie, but I personally think that it gave us probably some of the best SW Lego sets (the original ones, not the non-stop barrage of cloneslop since), so it can't be all bad, right?

>>11473914
>The dialogue is unintentionally hilarious
Anakin's monologue to Padme when she's wearing that salacious dress and ultimately rejects him is pure, passionate kino. Across the Stars is also one of the best themes Williams has ever produced.

>>11473916
>2cool4u faggotry
Now THIS is projection

>>11473910
Jesus Christ why are you playing dumb there's literally an official playbook manual for the set so people can play DND with it. It's not (only) a display piece its literally and fundamentally designed to be taken apart and have the different play areas, loads of secret coins, potions, keys, spells and equipment to collect, varied enemies and npc characters... Not to mention male and female heads and all the major races and classes so that you can truly costumize your adventure. It's all there

>>11473927
no it doesn’t have any of that

>>11473883
>female nigger elf wizard
Not interested

>>11473924
I think Hayden did as well as anyone could have with George’s dialogue but I don’t see it as kino
>salacious dress
I recently learned that dress was designed directly by Lucas and it was the only one he designed for the whole movie

>>11473929
So you don't own it. Just like the other guy who thinks play features are trap doors which the DnD set also has(and more inventive since it's activated by grabbing a key and throws you into a perilous underground lair full of adventure not a prison)

>>11473922
For me, it's the big Technic Pimpfire tank (which ironically is more in accurate scale to minifigures than most System vehicles) and SBD.

>>11473933
hmmmmmmm no pretty sure ur wrong

>>11473927
>different play areas, loads of secret coins, potions, keys, spells and equipment to collect, varied enemies and npc characters
None of this shit is any more or less interactive than the interior of a modular building set. I could write my own "guidebook" for the Tudor corner, and have the vacuum cleaner turn into a magical enemy mob. That's not a play function. It's a static model with less moving parts and features than LKK.

>>11473934
I have this set in storage somewhere. It’s really cool. it was the sturdiest of all Star Wars sets of that era.
>size accurate
And aesthetically so too. It works on a lot of levels

>>11473883
this is my favorite modern set even if it is expensive

>>11473934
>Pimpfire
wut

>Play is defined by turning a knob that makes something happen
Ok

>>11473912
For me play is defined by whether or not a set has a toilet. If it doesn’t have it? Display set

>>11473943
Idk, that's just what I always called it. It is pretty pimpin'.
>>11473941
Definitely. I wish they'd kept doing SW Technic stuff because every single one of those sets was a banger. I guess the Technic Jango looked a bit derpy in the legs, but he had a lot of great indigo parts.

>>11473947
there's a bucket in the evil wizard's lair

>>11473942
Mine too. I've been modding it(and added the 12 cmfs) to make it even more to my liking. Once I'm done I'll probably post a pic

>>11473947
So... Lego designer, or just german?

>>11473951
Ordering it now with priority shipping

>>11473945
yes. why do you think they shove stud shooters into every mousewars set

>>11473401
I was on the fence about it overall, but the female soldiers were enough to convince me that I didn't want to spend money on it.

>>11473963
They should bring back those technic launchers for Star Wars system sets because nobody actually likes stud shooters not even kids because

>>11473966
I just replace all the heads with generic smiley faces. The catch is that in my mind all the smiley faces are GIRLS

Absolute dogshit

>>11473966
>but the female soldiers
It's swapping one lego head for another how is this even remotely an issue are you retarded by chance?

>>11473969
>technic launchers
Do the big FU missiles even get made for any theme any more?

And now its over.

A tour of his Lego themed NYC apartment!

https://youtu.be/-yIut2xguSc?si=qXt4kt-QKP1L06Ei

>>11473978
>It's swapping one lego head for another
For one, the set doesn't come with those. For two, I'm not interested in spending money on subversive garbage.

>>11473978
Not the classic blunt shooters or their later slimmer redesign, no. I'm pretty sure Marvel sets use (or used recently) the modern equivalent, which is like a doublewide version of the spring launcher brick with a differently shaped large missile.

>>11473987
>For two, I'm not interested in spending money on subversive garbage.
Fuck outta here with that moral grandstanding. If you truly meant that, you wouldn't give Lego a dime ever again. But you will, and you'll pat yourself on the back "at least THIS set isn't woke!". It's all coming from the same company lil bro, makes no difference.

>>11473401
I didn't buy it because I felt like an absurd amount of the pieces probably went into recreating the baseplate.

>>11473998
He’s baiting you anon

>>11474001
Smae. I get that it's got hidden details and crap, but seriously, I can't not feel gypped for having to pay for 500 pieces to replicate what used to be a single part. The whole point of raised baseplates and BURPs was precisely to avoid that shit.

>>11473978
>Do the big FU missiles even get made for any theme any more?
they do not. But they were cool. Those were the last cool launchers. Stud shooters are stupid. Even people that might like them just get annoyed by them because a stud is too small to be a projectile. It gets lost

>>11474001
The rocks have an interior and the set is designed so you configure the structure in different ways.
As much as I love classic Lego and am all for flat baseplates I will never go along the raised baseplate aficionados. That shit is flimsy as fuck. Just looks good and that's it

>>11473883
>It's really good, just not $360 good
That's basically all lego now

>>11474007
The old baseplate would cost an insane amount today. I don't think most people realize how much those things inflated the prices of old sets.

Jang makes a pretty good comparison showing how if you adjust for inflation the prices are actually very comparable while the new one has a lot more value
https://youtu.be/l0VtEO1sxO0?si=td2kpW-YLVJ3C6vE

>>11474022
Yeah, okay, the whole "adjust for inflation" cope is horseshit, thanks. Adjust for wages instead.

>>11473984
I pray for the day he falls down the stairs

>>11473883
>>11474017
That’s why I turned to knockoffs and alternatives. It’s weird to see even Jang review alternatives now https://youtu.be/cH6iXl_qx_c?si=oad5TbdTomUVwJQf

Maybe if more legofans seriously started to looking at them too, lego will be forced to lower their prices.

>>11474022
>>11474030
Cost of living too, maybe even more so. I don't think Jang is a complete retard, but his fixation on inflation as an argument doesn't do him any favors.

>>11473878
HS>I>>>>>II>VII>VI>TCW>IX>VIII>III>TA>TM>IV>>>>>>>>>>>>>>V>Genndywars>Kenobi>Andor

The gate goes too deep into the building. The red volume has more than half the content.

>>11474057
Truth Death Star laser

>>11474061
It's not even good content. I really wanted to like this set but it's a big no from me, sadly

>>11474044
lol I just saw one of those brand of sets at a flea market! I didn't ask how much it was (it was Water Mill F9061 if you were curious which one)

I fully support Lego getting quality competition. Lego is out of control with these multi-hundred-dollar sets, and they could use a good humble-ing

>>11474061
I just really don’t like that awkward slope leading up to the drawbridge.

The problem with alt brands is that they rarely do their own thing or even play sets for that matter. It's mostly [18+ lego set] but NotLego(tm)! Almost no other brands have their own themes like Dreamzzz or Ninjago, even simple stuff like fantasy castle is absent. If I just wanted some random MOC I'd just go to rebrickable.
Mega Bloks had the right idea with Dragons and Pyrates but that was decades ago and no one has replicated it since.

I'd gladly consoom other brands so I can give the finger to Lego but no one is making stuff I'm interested in. The only exception has been that viking longboat house but only because it goes well with Lego's Viking Village and doesn't really hold up on its own.

>>11474090
Fun while/lumibricks has a whole line of westerns which is great since I don’t think lego will ever return to that theme

>>11474090
Well when I think of /pbbg/ I think of tanks and jeeps and warplanes based on real life 20th century armies. And Lego doesn’t like making sets of that unless it is a license

itt: """""villains""""" who did nothing wrong

Starting with the obvious.

>>11474125
I like the other more triangular burp but this one is awful

>>11474125
fantastic for underwater sets

>>11474125
Personally I love these pieces,
it’s 80% of this build

>>11474158
thats great

>>11474125
The amount of basic bricks in this is refreshing after modern sets.

>>11474125
Another that gets shit for juniorisation but is really full of absolutely kino parts.

>>11474158
Looks great aesthetically but my autism makes anything that mixes greys look off no matter what to me. The greenish hue against blueish grey just sticks out like a sore thumb.

>>11474106
That's still rather uninspired and like it's purposefully trying to be "the western Icons set Lego wouldn't do". And they're good, don't get me wrong, just not what particularly catches my eye.

>>11474110
I have a few Coni sets but they are what they are. It's just a brick built tank/plane. You don't have fun stuff like opening up a panel to reveal flick fire missiles, twisting a knob to drop bombs, or a vlaw to grab minifigs with for example.
>just mod it lol
Then why buy it in the first place when Lego already does what I want?

>>11473401
But I did, that said, Imperial Trading Post was the better Soldier’s fort and would’ve been my pick for a remake, although the Eldorado Fortress does pair very well with the Barracuda remake.

>>11474176
If the fort has a Spanish name, why is it in Australia?

>>11473401
1. I have the original
2. It's overpriced for what it is
3. I could get the minifig parts on PaB so not getting it just for them
I did buy the sails and build my own ship though.

>>11474057
When are we getting a figure of the giant rat

>>11471788
bring back rock raiders or aqua zone
I love space mining adventures

>>11474090
Lol no

>>11473673
I wonder if the figures will look like the Lego fortnite ones, they look pretty good

>>11474224
Thanks for your valuable input.

>>11474223
I wanna do something like that but do a space mining train, that would be cool

>>11472900
That Slave Leia figure is still atrocious

>>11474159
Thanks
>>11474172
Thanks, yeah, this is literally used up all my grey pieces, but I myself like the way the old and new greys look when mixed together, it feel it gives it a little more texture, looking back I should have spaced them out a little more, but this is an old moc, it’s been broken down

Why, in an era of Weimar-level sexual deviancy, is Lego becoming more prudish?
>inb4 it's not a big deal
uh huh, then why change it?

>>11474465
>they removed her vagina bones
it's over

>>11473984
If I had to pick the worst thing on that webm, I'd go with the fucking tiktok logo around 0:12
Seriously, what the fuck

>>11474465
>Weimar-level sexual deviancy
That's mostly for women wanting to get fucked by mythical feral beasts, vampires, serial killers or rich tall high status chads. Str*ight m*n get nothing because plastic minifigs having visible booba or vagina bones contributes to rape culture

>>11474465
(I'll lead off with clarification that I fully support sexy minifigs)

you're probably trolling for the "agenda" reasons, which would be a confirmation on the targeting against straight white males. anything they would "like" is done opposite. on purpose, to make them seeth (is that the word the kids use these days?)

the truth is probably, simply, Lego is afraid of backlash against social media rage storms. they dare not risk making a sexy minifig, or else [person on the internet] throws a tantrum and Lego erm.. looks bad. no thank you, problem avoided.

Lego can do the cowardly explanation where they try to say gender-neutral torsos make them more usable since you can now make girls or thin boys, where if they put those boob lines, those pieces are only usable for girl characters. it sounds logical, so people accept it

if you are looking for sexual deviancy, that is ALL OVER Lego. it's hard to find a set these days that does not include one character wearing a pink/white/light blue color pattern, or a brown poop-swirl piece. (it would not surprise me to find out there's some fetish I've never heard about that has been in Lego sets for years... maybe the animal costume heads?)

hope you enjoyed the blog post. the trend might be reversing, they did include a sexy-ish minifig in the pink F&F Walmart exclusive car

>>11474522
>the truth is probably, simply, Lego is afraid of backlash against social media rage storms. they dare not risk making a sexy minifig, or else [person on the internet] throws a tantrum
Who would get upset at this? They've been making figures with tits for decades, now all of a sudden it's problematic? Kids are more exposed to sexual content today than they ever have been, what puritan would get angry at Lego of all companies for PG-level accuracy?

I'm convinced it's some tranny feminist types at the board level responsible for these changes. The same ones responsible for the poop fetish.

>>11474540
the Lego designers are trying to (not literally) suck-up to the boss

I imagine this conversation happened---

designer: here boss! what if we put a figure exactly like YOU into the core group! it will be so inspirational for little kids!

boss:I'm so flattered! o-only if you guys think that's a good idea, I don't want to seem like I'm trying to push myself or my life choices into the product

designer: oh,no! that's not it at all! also, isn't it funny that kids like poop? we noticed you have a pile on your desk

boss: poop you say? haha yeah let's make sure to put that in every set we can.... because the kids think it's funny. you said that, right?

designer: totally. by the way, employee reviews are coming up. I just want you to know I think your policies are the best!

boss: hey. I'm just approving of YOUR designs! you are the one really doing the good job!

Why are whites a minority in childrens' sets from a Denmark-based toy company?

>>11474589
Blackrock, vanguard, and statestreet.

>>11474589
It represents the brand as a whole having only 1 hub in a white nation and the rest in non white nations.
Also outreach to children is a goal of the family, they want as many hands on their product as possible and one of the best ways is to include familiar looking characters in their toys.

>>11474589
Because white genocide, west has fallen, reeeeeeee
Or, you know, it’s just this >>11474599

>>11474589
Israel.

>>11474595
>>11474617
I thought the Blackrock money dried up?

>>11474599
>>11474610
This would only make sense if the demographics of the consumer base were a reflection of global demographics as well, but they're not, Lego is predominantly purchased by white, middle class families. So why is Lego UNDER representing them?

>>11474622
Not over until the nose cow dies out.
>>11474610
Dead cats.

I haven't heard anyone talking about this, but Carschads, we won! I wonder if Lightning McQueen will fit a minifigure inside of him or will he be the first Speed Champions without a minifigure.
Also our first minifigure scale Delorean in 10 years.

>>11474629
>cars is 20 years old

>>11474629
>I wonder if Lightning McQueen will fit a minifigure inside of him or will he be the first Speed Champions without a minifigure.
The set will include a humanized version of him.

>>11474629
>>11474676
Cars never had people (which bothers me, but that's just me) so there is no way they would include a minifig. Unless... maybe just flat-out do a "voice actor" and make it really Owen Wilson the minifig?!

we never got Mobius from the Loki series (he would be perfect for a polybag on the personal sea craft!!!)

They should bring back guns

>>11474800
>so there is no way they would include a minifig. Unless... maybe just flat-out do a "voice actor" and make it really Owen Wilson the minifig?!
I think it's possible. It would be the most likely minifigure, if it were to come with a minifigure.
I'm mostly surprised because this opens several new opportunities for Speed Champions. For example, it would be our first fictional car brand (Speed Champions when it had movie licenses, only used real world auto manufacturers. Although McQueen looks like a Corvette, he's a fictional brand of car) and animated cars allowed now.

Found a vacuum cleaner bag by the trash bin today and look what was inside. I have had a real dry spell with finding real Lego lately. Kind of a bummer.

>>11473984
How is this Lego themed? I just see a bunch of boxes and Funko’s
>>11474570
This mini doll looks like Ellen DeGeneres.
>>11474589
Either they are catering to US market of Denmark has fallen.

>>11474850
>How is this Lego themed?
Open the link

Why is classic legos so comfy and sovlful?

>>11474872
Years ago One of jangs paypigs sent him this
jang was nearly crying unboxing it(his usually fake bullshit act)
jang never reviewed it or mentioned it again.

>>11474872
Small amount of simple pieces. Small amount of simple colors.

>>11474125
love these
what are they called again?

>>11474892
you must be thinking of
BURP
Big Ugly Rock Piece

>>11474872
Does anyone own these monorails ?
Is it hard to get replacement electronic parts ?

>>11474872
My MOCs skyrocketed in soul the moment I paired down the amount of colors I use. It also prevents analysis paralysis because you don't have to overthink all the options you have, the "right" color scheme suddenly becomes obvious.

fuck, man
i'm trying to run lego racers on my windows 11 laptop but i only get as far as seeing the top left corner of the title menu taking up my screen before it immediately crashes
i tried using a custom launcher but that ended up with the same result

>>11474125
Why do AFOLosers hate these?

How would you feel if the $1000 death star set was return of the Jedi only? No new hope stuff. Pure episode VI, Unfinished exterior, the whole thang

>>11475038
>>11475040
>>11475042
>>11475043
>>11475045

>>11475038
>negaduck airspeeder
Sweet. Although I'm not sure why call it a snowspeeder when there's no snow around.
Also, is that a shitasszoomertransorange lightsaber blade? I mean it would have to be since they stopped making real transorange, but I don't think they'd done one before so that's also kinda nice.
>>11475040
AAAAAAAA WHY IS IT SO FUCKING TINY AND WHY ARE THE WHEELS SO SHIT
Still, you know the cloniggers are gonna lap it up purely for the figs. Which I think was the entire design philosophy for this set, just make the actual set a parts tax for the minifigures.
>>11475042
>no Zam
Gay.
>>11475043
I know people were bitching earlier about all the CIS stuff being blue, but I'm kind of glad it's not another brown turd.
>>11475045
>yet another fucking AT-ST
At least the legs aren't made exactly the same way as the past ten versions like usual.
(Thanks for reading my blog.)

>>11475049
>you can't post pics of new sets anymore or else you are a shill
Kys

>>11475053
Very suspect that you knew exactly what that vague screenshot was supposed to mean tbdesu.
>>11475049
I wouldn't worry about it, though. The thread's already past bump limit. He's really at his worst when he's pathetically sameniggering a fresh thread to keep it at the top of the catalog.

>>11475056
You literally complain about him every fucking thread you fucking moron, I'm tired of both of you and I legit think goanon left, but you are still a piece of shit. Kys

>>11475056
>suspect
Anon, did you fucking read it? Faggot

>>11475053
If you're not a shill then you're a pathetic onions-addicted slop consoooming faggot who cares about the shitty new sets instead of doing anything interesting with lego.

>>11475057
You sound vexed :)

>>11475057
>I legit think goanon left
There is still someone who insists on making extra new threads because for some reason he doesn't like nigger and fag being written in the OP, almost like it wouldn't fly with a payed position and the threads without slurs in the OP mysteriously get spammed with official promotional images of sets rather than images way more than posters' own lego

>>11475065
You forgot how none of said threads conveniently have an OP image that isn't itself one form of promotional imagery or another (he especially thinks he's being subtle with the "classic" ones).

>>11475030
that would be pointless since there was only the one scene in the throne room on the 2nd Death Star. maybe you could have the shuttle bay "help me take off my mask" scene? that's only 2 places

it might be fun to watch fans freak out if they had a bonus Galen Erso and/or Orson Krennic. for 1000 bucks they could even include a new molded Poggle the Lesser... remember he had the holo-projected plans in episode 3?

>>11475030
It wouldn’t make a difference to me because I’m not buying that, however they won’t do return of the Jedi by itself because there aren’t enough setpieces. There’s
>the hanger
>the emperor’s throne room
Meanwhile the original Death Star has over a dozen little scenes. It’s either A New Hope exclusive or A new Hope + throne room

>>11475113
>inserting yidsney fanfiction faggot revisionism cringe into a strictly OT set
Fucking disgusting. Neck yourself for even being capable of having such a thought occur to you.

>>11475040
>>11475042
>>11475043
I actually think these look good.
>>11475038
This is also fine but I don’t remember this part. Is this from clone wars?

>>11475126
No, it's purely Lego-original whimsy, and it's wonderful. Same line as the Dark Falcon and Jedi Bob's Starfighter from last year (and I guess also the X-Wing and TIE Fighter set, but I consider that more of an official Ugly kit).

>>11475125
I really don’t think it’s important either way. Anyone who plays with Star Wars Legos is doing his own fanfic

>>11475125
what an over-reaction. chill. I wrote "it would be fun to watch fans freak out" which is exactly what you did.
I thought people liked Rogue One?

it's not like someone at Lego is reading this and will be like.... yeah! Galen Erso! hey, is it too late to put him in?!

>>11475143
No, I'm with him, that was a really reddit thing to say, and you're kinda just doubling down on that now

>>11475040
>160 dollars
how

>>11475114
>Meanwhile the original Death Star has over a dozen little scenes
You guys are really setting yourself up for disappointment. Have you seen how pitiful the interior of the $800 falcon is? I guarantee you at least 70% of the set focus will be on the exterior display. The interior won't in any way be the "improved" version of the old death star set, with the new standards for adult display models there's much more of a requirement to keep things hyperdetailed and realistic which even with the outlandish price won't be possible to do for everything(meeting room, interrogation cell and corridor, trash compactor, the room where han shoots the computer, rope swinging room, obiwan disabling the generator thing room, superlaser control room...), they can't get away with making little symbolic representations of the areas the way they did at the time. There's zero chance of all of this being featured

>>11475167
I have no expectations and I’m not buying it. I can’t be disappointed. I’m just saying it won’t be ROTJ exclusive because that doesn’t make sense. Aren’t there like 30+ figures? Who would those figures be in ROTJ? 30 stormtroopers?

>>11475178
I don't think anybody except you actually thought that was a serious proposal.

>>11475183
Let’s recap
>Anon imagines premise
>i say that premise doesn’t make sense and give reason why
>someone tries to change subject to something about star wars set interiors and claims I will be disappointed even though I already said I’m not going to purchase it
>I reiterate my original point in order to clarify
>you are upset with me for replying the first time

>>11475194
>you are upset
Yeah, okay, a) keep the womanish passive-aggression to yourself, pal, and b) I thought you were this faggot >>11475113.

>>11475197
>womanish passive aggression
See >>11475183 for more kettle on pot action

>>11474465
kill yourself

>>11474465
Keep living

>>11475194
I only interjected since you said it's gonna be a new hope because it has all these little scenes. Of course it will be a new hope set I was just saying don't expect to get even half of those little scenes, not trying to cause an argument but this idea that the set is gonna be like the old death star but bigger and better seems prevalent so I just took the opportunity to explain that ain't so

>>11475205
>no u
Very compelling argument, faggot.

>>11475241
Ditto

>>11475065
>payed
I could tell that you were a paranoid schizo, but you being poorly educated comes as a shock.

>>11475038
The only set from from this entire overpriced minifag bait wave that I actually care about. Really hope they don't botch the build because that little bit sticking out from under the nose is worrying me. If I have to mod a $50 snowspeeder I'll pass.

>>11475038
>>11475040
>>11475042
>>11475043
Oh, these actually look really coo-
>$0.20 price per piece
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>11475260
“poorly educated” doesn’t mean anything anymore. The modern education system doesn’t educate. It’s just grooming and daycare. “Poorly educated” exposes you as either an out of the loop educator or an ESL Dalit. Call him illiterate or retarded next time

>>11475038
wasn't there supposed to be a green rabbit character?

>>11474622
>is predominantly purchased by white
Not really, at least from what I've seen.
>middle class
Yeah, it is a premium brand after all.
Shit the last head of LBR was a black dude whos family loved the products before even getting the job. He's the reason why LEGO dropped Adidas for Nike, further expanding the "demographics of the consumer base".

>>11475007
Try compatability mode or run it in a VM with XP installed.

>>11475313
Your observational evidence is flawed.
They don’t even have data for Africa or the Middle East and they’ve been trying to make headway in Asia for years without much progress.

>>11475038
That looks kinda neat, though I'm unfamiliar with any of the characters. I know the set itself is entirely a Lego original and not based on anything, but are the characters OCs, too?

>>11475441
Yeah, I'm pretty sure "Sig Greebling" is an OC along with the rest. I'm quite certain all the characters in this line are OCs except the generic rebel and TIE pilots.

Since there's already a non-bumb limit thread up might as well migrate.

>>11471745
>>11471745
>>11471745

>>11475481
No, we won't. Not until this hits 150 images, kys.

>>11475287
I think I'm pretty much done with star wars lego, everything is somehow smaller and more expensive than they used to be. I keep seeing ashoka's interceptor and the new u-wing and arc fighter in the shops but they still too expensive even with a 20-30% discount.

[Insert DiCaprio laughing in Django meme image here]

>>11475481
No thanks

>>11475516
Why

>>11475496
That's become their modus operandi with SW. They saw that people only buy when on discount so they just double the price, slap a 20% discount and suddenly mousecucks think it's a good deal, even though they're still buying a single 500 piece vehicle for $70

>>11475556
That's not smart for long term profit, retailers will stop getting lego star wars then if they will keep selling them on discount.

>>11475557
Amazon has them discountent practically 24/7 and chains like Walmart and Target do clearances constantly.

>>11475496
it's so frustrating that there is no way to demonstrate, to Lego, the problems keeping me from buying. other than um... not buying.

would I buy a Lego Zelda set? absolutely. for $300? absolutely NOT. so I don't.

but the sales data they look at CAN'T show that, can it? they simply see X profits, and it's successful, and they conclude that there is no reason to make less expensive sets.

there's simply no sales model to show how well a $50 Zelda set would sell, because they didn't do it. and Lego won't try because it would clearly cut into the sales numbers of the $300 set (which probably wouldn't sell AT ALL if there was a $50 option, of course!)

it might even be impossible at this point. if all of a sudden, nobody bought Lego (due to expensive price) the company would implode before they figured out it was due to high prices and there would be no time to try to sell less-expensive sets.

I guess what I'm saying is that those expensive, small, Star Wars sets are still selling, so there is no reason for Lego to lower the prices or increase the value. and not-buying in protest... doesn't seem to affect Lego at all.

>>11475260
>deflection
Doesn’t change anything else of what I said, people are either shills or acting like shills for free and in either case they should die.
kys, shill
>inb4 im not a shill
>he does it for free

>I like all new star wars sets
>see prices
And that's why I dropped out of lego star wars, funny marvel has better prices

>>11475567
>hello fellow lego fans
>please help us with our market research
>>11471419
You do know every single set comes with a QR code to take a survey right?
Of course you did.
You’re definitely not trying to datamine right friendo?

>>11475593
You are mentally ill

we're still pushing the "TLG totally cares enough about what the twelve autistic retards that post in /lg/ think to do market research here" meme huh

>>11475599
Ok Paul

and the paul meme too of course

>>11475410
>pay the most and least
>with no sources
>as evidence of racial demographics that purchase
Also that infograph must be very old, LBR has a huge market in China (with internal sales data to back up that).

>>11475599
Again, why wouldn’t they do research here?
They’re obsessive about analytics.
Do you understand how datamining works?
Why wouldn’t they invest the time to see what people actually like or dislike about the product.
>>11475567
>>11471419
Are clearly examples of totally organic posts.
Our resident spammer freaking out when you put a *shudder* slur in the OP text.
When the shill gets blatantly called out and busted and spams the board with porn to Nuke the thread.
I’m just saying if there aren’t lg shills here they sure larp like lego shills really well.

>>11475593
>You do know every single set comes with a QR code to take a survey right?
Of course you did.

I have to buy a set before I get the code? I'm not spending $300 to tell Lego I don't want to spend $300

>>11475646
You are insane, touch grass

75431 - 327th Star Corp Battle Pack

• Includes 258 pieces
• US $44.99 - DE/FR €39.99 - UK £TBA
• Release: AUGUST 1ST 2025

>>11475646
>Again, why wouldn’t they do research here?
Again, read this >>11475599
>twelve autistic retards
That's a tiny sample size and probably a generous overestimation. You're deranged. Seek professional help.

>>11475646
Let's pretend for a moment that there are any opinions in this general that are even worth the effort of "datamining" (or at least your incorrect definition of it) here. Why the act then? If they really want honest opinions, why wouldn't they just be up front and say "hey I'm a Lego rep, what feedback do you have for us?"
>Lego wouldn't want to be associated with the hacker known as 4chan
>People would doubt it's a real rep anyway
Both issues could be solved with an online survey that they could simply drop the link to here. Add a section asking where you found the link if it's REALLY that important that they know which surveys are coming from 4chin. Or they could pose as an organic poster complaining about prices, wait to see if people agree, and then... continue to sell huge overpriced sets. Sure, that makes sense.

>>11475599
who has the picture of the short blue-haired, glasses,gender-less, overweight, blank-staring person with the meme text "modern Hollywood exists only to appeal to this specific person"? I tried to find it but gave up after a minute.

the only reason Lego would even think to look here, is to justify some crazy decision. they don't care that we complain about POOP IN SETS ARGH! but if they wanted to include poop, and there was one person who posted "hey it's just a silly joke, kids "get it" so calm down" then they can take that to the management as "researched data from social media!" and include the poop.

it takes a few minutes each day to browse this mess, it seems like a very reasonable thing to believe Lego could fit into someone's job duties.

and if they ARE reading this... please Lego stop with the poop. it's not funny anymore, it's gross. once in the dog walking CMF set was cute. but you've gone way too far with toilets in every set. stop. please. MOC all the toilets and poop you want, it doesn't need to be included in all the sets on the shelves in the store. to be clear: no more toilets, no more poop.

>>11475654
But anon… I am touching grass.
Hey, way to answer the question though!
I don’t use it, but I’ve heard if you even try to post bootlego on the legosub you’ll get the boot.
They control every one of the “totally a leak” images you see out there (don’t forget your 4% Gaussian blur to make it look low quality so we can release the high resolution images in two weeks after the totally legit viral hype).
Lego is only interested in making more money. They’re a company. That’s their job. Why wouldn’t they use every tool and troll at their disposal?
Why wouldn’t Lego do research everywhere they could?
>>11475647
You can also just go fill out a survey but you knew that already.

Maybe if we ignored schizo anon's inane babbling about his obsession for a man named Paul, the general could be a place worth interacting in.

>>11475674
I didn’t even bring up Paul but hey at least your go to is always the same.
>Lego doesn’t know about 4chan and there hasn’t been a bad actor(s) shitting up this general for a couple years now and if you think they do you’re a crazy insane schizo

>>11475678
We know who you are. We know who lives rent free in your cluttered mind. We also can see that YOU are the bad actor shitting up these threads. You could just let it go, but you're inescapably obsessed with shills that if you "detect" even the slightest hint of a post being shill worthy, you must to reply and give it more attention than if it was just ignored by the other six or so other anons browsing this thread.

>>11475659
$45 USD!? Boi...

>>11475679
You looking in a mirror over there?
Again, I didn’t bring Pauline up. But clearly I rustled your jimmies.
Insert slur here.

>>11475686
Cool. I didn't even reply to you here >>11475674 so maybe that means I'm not talking about you. Did you consider that? No because everything is about you. I made a post here about an anon talking about Boogeyman Paul in every thread about lego and you thought it was about you. Interpret that however you like. You're shitting up this thread the more you post about shit that isn't lego related. And before you claim I'm doing the same, I wouldn't have made a comment if schizo posts like yours weren't in abundance.

>>11475695
Sounds like you need to touch some grass.
What’re you building today?

>>11475700
This is /lg/. No one builds here. You should try the moc thread instead.

>>11475700
Sounds like you can't refute anything I said.

>>11475659
>>11475682
Lego doesn't need the action figure exclusive licence. they simply toss in a few blocks and it's a "building set" and they can now sell them in bulk and it's the only option. what a great abuse of the policy in their favor. "hey... we would sell minifigs separately like action figures, but we... can't!"

let's pause and appreciate the brilliant idea of trooper colors. original Star Wars had ONE Stormtooper color pattern (or... lack-of-pattern)

Book: 512255 Pokémon: Das große Lexikon (Source: Brickmerge)

So, at first it seemed strange it didnt look like lego, the cover didnt have anything lego but looking into it the cover mentions it being preliminary, another website that had this ltoys had other pokemon books but they were all pokemon branded this (ean 9783845122557) was listed as being lego brand, looking up the ean number led into a ebay page which did not mention anything lego same preliminary cover, it costed 18 euro on both sites, brickmerge said the release was 2025, however if it was i would think its late 2025 to maybe build up some hype,

>>11475741
>let's pause and appreciate the brilliant idea of trooper colors
It's just Warhammer marine legions but for nu-males.

>>11475779
What does that mean?

So the vacuum cleaner bag I found in the trash and cut open did have some real Lego. After cleaning off off the dust and hair I found these bits were real. Looks like I’m back.

>>11475782
>implying Warhammer marine legions aren't for nu-males already

>>11475287
heh um ACKCHUALLY this is a good thing because muh adjusted for inflation olay sweaty??

>>11475782
>It's just Warhammer marine legions but for nu-males.
That's also Warhammer marine legions

>>11475659
I can't wait to buy this for $25 in 6 months...

>>11476056
Still too much

New set reveals...

Set: 75432 - V-19 Torrent

• Includes 567 pieces
• US $64.99 - DE/FR €64.99 - UK £TBA
• Release: AUGUST 1ST 2025

>>11476512
Forgot pic

Soundwave's announcement is right around the corner, right?

>>11476513
Wow that looks fucking ugly, what's going on with the weird front bit on the engines?
>$65
I really hope the Star Wars line starts to shelfwarm hard, even with a 30% discount this would still be too expensive.

>>11476516
>700 pieces
WAT???

>>11476515
Does it have butthole?

>>11476643
>awfully hot in these rhinos

>>11471778 (OP)
>>11471928
Well i finally went to the Lego house today, bought a Lego Star Wars and Formula 1 sets. No classic minifigures.....I just wanted prime Redbeard and Johnny Thunder.....

>>11474629
>I wonder if Lightning McQueen will fit a minifigure inside of him
>he doesn't know

Holy shit it's Junkbot

>>11476911
I can tell the boxes up on that shelf... the purple one is a Gamecube, the one in the back is a freaking Neo-Geo, but I'm not sure about the middle one. Maybe Playstation 1, Maybe Dreamcast?

is this real Lego?

>>11476982
no

>>11476982
this?

>>11476982
RTFM
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogTree.asp?itemType=P

>>11473085
I took mine apart and made a whole bunch of Castle bullshit.

(This all is made using only half the Castle)

>>11477186
So much soul holy shit

>>11477115
An improvement. Nice job anon

what are the odds of the gumball machine minifigures coming to pick a brick?

>If you're not a shill then you're a pathetic onions-addicted slop consoooming faggot who cares about the shitty new sets instead of doing anything interesting with lego.
>buy jurassic sets because im paleonerd and always wanted to moc a Lego dinosaur zoo and thought that the sets would make great bases to start from.
Even used the tree design from from the gyroscope rides to update my zoo mocs trees.
>that somehow makes me "onions-addicted slop consoooming faggot"

>>11477707
It feels low.

>>11477707
it would not surprise me if they actually DID put some of those in the pick-a-minifig bins. but they would 100% half-ash it, and NOT do the entire figure.

for example, the torsos and legs for these Kraken Knights but not the helmets. or maybe even those cool helmets but not the green ninja masks (so you would want to seek out expensive Ninjago sets or whatever to get the green ninja masks)

so I think yes, but -not what you want-

100% at least one of them makes it to a keychain. my guess would be Paradisa or Fabuland, probably both of those will get keychains

>>11477707
Why would (((Lego))) intentionally gimp the newest evolution of their CMF minifig scam when they can keep collecting an extra profit margin from scalpniggers on Bricklink?

>>11477869
>Paradisa or Fabuland
Oh, if it was going to be anything, it'd definitely be either the 80s gay AIDS heroin addict or the latest fursuit head (I don't think I'm saying anything controversial when I say that neither fig properly represents either them).

>>11477891
*theme

>>11477869
I think this is going to be true Specifically because the brown helmet is the only part I want out of the entire set.
>>11477735
It’s a massive missed opportunity for lego to not lean into the zoo aesthetic of Jurassic park. Like each set could be modularly combined like most Harry Potter sets. Not that you can’t just moc that, but I think that would make for more interesting sets.

>>11477899
>>11477707
>>11477889
Lego doesn't have many "wow that was cool, bro" moments, but every once-in-a-while they surprise me.

remember when they released that big castle, and not too much later, the Lion Knight torsos and legs DID show up in the build-a-minifig bins? and in such quantities, that you might still be able to find some today.

they even had that Vidiyo unicorn head, re-colored yellow and deco'd to match. (those are probably all gone though)

>>11471849
New jang city is KIA

How specialized are the parts for the vending machine? If I get it and want to make something else is it going to be a headache?

>>11478057
It's a modern Lego "thing but lego" sculputre, what do you think? For god's sake, don't buy it just for the figures. You don't want all of them anyway. While I'm usually the last person to recommend buying select minifigures from an expensive set from a scalpnigger at a grossly inflated cost, it may legitimately be the better option here, even if it is playing into their hands.

>>11478057
>>11478068
I agree 100%
do not "support" the $180+ sets by purchasing them

it's out of control and I feel like there's nothing I can do about it. crazy rich people keep buying those sets, and crazy rich Lego keeps pushing the prices higher and higher. blah blah piece count blah blah "value for the money" STOP IT LEGO. I don't want to spend $400 for my Star Trek minifigs aaaaaarrrggghhhh!!!!!!

New

>>11478844
>>11478844
>>11478844

>>11478057
The parts for the knights you want will end up on PaB for $1 each or less.
It happened with black falcons.
It happened with blue and green forestmen.
It happened with pirates.
It happened with lion knights.
It happened with peasants.
It happened with imperial soldiers.
It happened with vikings.
It happened with wolfpack.

Be patient.

SOVL

i used to own this