If it's a Boeing, i ain't going.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14805721/Crashed-Gatwick-bound-Air-India-Boeing-Dreamliner-carrying-242-including-53-Brits-suffered-power-loss-just-bird-strike-blame.html

>>2793144 (OP)

>>2793144 (OP)
It's not Boeing. It's the jeet workers.

>>2793161
Yeah sure, it's never Boeing...
In the last ten years only:
>Feb 13, 2018: United Airlines Flight 1175, 777 suffered in-flight engine fan blade separation over the Pacific, no injuries
>Oct 29, 2018 Lion Air Flight 610, 737crashed into Java Sea due to MCAS malfunction; 189 dead
>Mar 10, 2019 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, Similar MCAS-induced crash; 157 dead
>Jan 8, 2020 UIA Flight 752, 737 from Tehran; 176 dead
>Jan 14, 2020: Delta Flight 89 (777‑200ER) had compressor stall and dumped fuel above Los Angeles; 56 ground injuries
>Feb 5, 2020: Pegasus 2193 (737‑800) overran runway at Istanbul–Sabiha Gökçen, 3 dead, 179 injured
>Jan 5, 2024: Alaska Airlines Flight 1282, 737 experienced door-plug blow-off mid-air, causing decompression; emergency landing; minor injuries
>Early 2024: Multiple incidents including engine fire in Newark on a 737 MAX, tire/wheel blow-offs on 777s and 757s, external panel losses during flight.
>May 2024: Emergency landing of FedEx Boeing 767 in Istanbul due to front landing gear failure
>May 2024: Corendon Airlines 737‑800 burst tyre upon landing in Turkey
>Mid‑2024: Boeing paused 777X flight tests over engine-to-body part failure
and now
>June 12, 2025 – Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787‑8 Dreamliner, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, en route to London, 242 DEAD

If you fly Boeing, you have death wishes at this point.

>>2793159
thanks for putting in the arrow anon there's no way we would have spotted the massive fucking plane otherwise

>>2793166
Retarded take. Boeing accounts for the majority of planes so obviously it's also the majority of crashes.
>emergency landing
Not a crash
>Tire issue
Not a crash
>paused test flight
Not a crash
>engine issue with no injuries
Not a crash

>>2793171
lol boeing corporate apologists are so fucking weird

>>2793144 (OP)
I'm sure this has nothing to do with lazy and dumb jeet workers.

>>2793173
Airbus shills are fucking retarded.

>>2793171
>Boeing accounts for the majority of planes
>Currently, Boeing has a 40% market share, while Airbus has a 56% share. The remaining 4% is split between Embraer (at 3.6%) and China's COMAC (at 0.4%). In the first three months of 2025, Airbus produced 110 aircraft and Boeing produced 63 aircraft.
>>2793175
the world has more than two sides anon
>>2793174
screenshotting data going back to the 1940s is really desperate

>>2793171
The absolute COPE, kek

>>2793177
Ok, so an air jeet shill then?
>1940s
That's just the first page. Air india has too many crashes for one screenshot.

>>2793179
>listing tiny issues with no injuries or fatalities
retarded air jeet shill

Seems like the Ram air turbine deployed. That only happens if there's a complete power loss or manual deployment.

CCTV doesn't appear to show a bird strike. The plane just stalls, the plane being overloaded or not enough speed from the short runway doesn't explain the RAM deployment. Still possible it's pilot error but seems less likely

https://x.com/kaidensharmaa/status/1933164877733941316

>>2793180
>Ok, so an air jeet shill then?
grow up anon
the last entries before today with fatalities are a bomb and a freak accident

>>2793177
>According to FAA data, from 2014 to 2023 in the U.S.:
>198 Boeing technical incidents vs. 99 Airbus technical incidents

>>2793185
There are dozens of crashes. Why lie when anyone can check Wikipedia?

>someone survived barely injured

Holy fuck. Wouldn't rule out it being a hoax though.

>>2793188
>incidents with no fatalities
retarded boeing shill

>>2793192
Wikipedia's a boeing shill now? Reddit-level mental gymnastics.

>>2793194
incidents with no fatalities are fatal now? retarded corporate cocksucker mental gymnastics

>>2793195
Everyone knows how to check Wikipedia. No one is buying your retarded fake news.

Additional note for the non-retarded: Wikipedia has a separate page for Air India Express crashes and accidents. Be sure to check that one as well, since there were too many to list on the main Air India page.

>>2793194
>Wikipedia's a boeing shill now?
You're a shill for sure.
And yeah, no doubt there's a Boeing PR team working to promote their propaganda on Wikipedia. Like Israel does and like Globalists do.
But facts >>2793166 don't lie.

>>2793203
>Boeing edited Air India's Wikipedia page for the last several years to prepare for this particular crash
Mental gymnastics.

>>2793205
>WOOOWWWHHHAAAT??? Influence groups infiltrate Wikipedia to spread their propaganda?? Are you a cOnSPiRACY tHEoRIST or something?? Haven't you seen the debunking of this on Wikipedia?? Do you even believe in Science?? lelel, get a load on this goy!!

>>2793214
>air jeet has a spotless safety record
retarded globalist cuck

>>2793144 (OP)
>53 brits
mhmm

>>2793159
possible to edit this to call out the plane a little more? having trouble finding it

>>2793166
No source?

>>2793235
There's literally the flight numbers.
Check them one by one if you want, like "United Airlines Flight 1175" > right click > google, retard.

>>2793235
Yeah, I'm pretty sure a normal person wouldn't spend this much time putting something like this together. Only someone with a financial interest would do that. Could be someone trying to short Boeing's stock?

The no source thing just confirms it.

>>2793237
>what is chatGPT

>>2793161
>>2793171
>>2793175
>>2793181
>>2793194
>>2793196
>>2793205
>>2793235
>>2793237
Boeing in full damage control, kek

>>2793218
>corrrrrrrrr

>>2793245
there is some speculation that he actually caused the accident by opening the exit door inflight
don't know if that is a possibility or not

>>2793237
Their stock is only down a few percent. But it's possible to turn that into a lot more with leverage/margin (borrowed money). Or even a series of options compounding the gains.

>>2793247
I'm pretty sure they are impossible to open in flight, otherwise every terrorist out there would do that, why bother with bombs when you can open doors

>>2793159
looks like stalling with no flaps

>>2793251
true. but a door fell off an alaska airlines boeing midflight just last year. at this point i think anything is possible

>>2793251
Opening a door doesn't let them hijack the plane.

>>2793247
>>2793251
Opening the doors is impossible at high altitude where the pressure differential keeps it shut harder than any human can pull. At near ground level that wouldn't be a thing.

>>2793260
the plane wasn't at high altitude

>>2793263
Read the whole post

>>2793260
Opening a door near ground level wouldn't really do shit

>>2793196
>Everyone knows how to check Wikipedia
I know how to check wikipedia and upon doing so I can confirm that you are full of fucking shit.

>>2793258
And it didn't crash the plane which makes your theory extra retarded

>>2793302
What's the point of lying? Every one can tell you're wrong. Are you legit retarded?

flap status?

Real talk bros is flying (on an airbus) safe? Ive got multiple thai air asia and JAL flights coming up. Dont wanna get turned to dust. Feel like every support group just says it safe.

Boeing === death wish.
Never fly US DEI planes built by transPoC and pajeet firmware

>>2793623
No, you're going to die

>>2793634
Fuck i knew it.

>>2793166
>>Jan 8, 2020 UIA Flight 752, 737 from Tehran; 176 dead
that was the one the iranians shot down which you can't really blame on boeing

>>2793247
no pressure differential at that low altitude -> would be an emergency landing with lots of shitted pants but no real harm

>>2793247
You're speculating that he survived by jumping out the exit just before the plane crashed? That would be absolutely nuts.

>airliner crashing into third world rebar and concrete building
>third world building intact with plane wreckage hanging out of it

hmm

>>2793256
>>2793312
Landing gear should be tucked away at this point, and it looks like flaps are not deployed. Guessing the pilots accidentally retracted the flaps instead of pulling up the landing gear, so once they left the ground effect area they had no lift. Pilot mistook this for "no thrust" and deployed ram jet to try to get emergency power to continue controlling the plane. Only "positive" thing about this is that they kept the plane flying straight and level to try to make a controlled crash instead of pulling into a useless turn, but that may have been pure panic and not bravery/diligence.

I bet every single one of you retards rides in cars regularly. But sure, your fear of airplanes is totally based on facts and logic.

Soon, China will take over all Boeing customers because of videos like these.
The US is enjoying their brown hordes.

>>2793955
Why are /pol/cels still going on about flaps when it obviously was not the case? It seems like basement dwellers like you who have never been on a plane have a desperate need to feel knowledgeable on the internet. Engines lost power on takeoff and there is nothing they could have done.

It's weird that it's always women and/or brown pilots.

>>2793955
Some people are saying it looks like the landing gear was partially retracted then it stopped. All the evidence if pointing to both engines stopping at this point. No signs of a bird strike and the time span seems way too short for a pilot to decide to turn the engine off and turn off the wrong one anyway.

There have been fuel quality scandals at Indian airports before

This is why I goon my head off and eat delicious food in the week leading up to any flight.

At the end the day, you're getting in a metal tube screaming through the atmosphere and loaded with explosive jet fuel. Your safe arrival at your destination depends entirely on trusting thousands of other people.

You're trusting the manufacturer not to fuck you over with cut corners.

You're trusting the airline's maintenance.

You're trusting the pilots to be high IQ and rational if something goes wrong.

You're trusting the Arabs two rows back not to go full Allah Ackbar.

You're even trusting your own body not to stroke out or heart attack in a place where you can get no rapid help.

Any comedy of errors or bad luck happening and it's night night forever. A moment of intense panic and then absolute black oblivion.

That's pretty fucking scary when you think about it. Travel is awesome enough to take the risk but if it doesn't pan out in your favor, holy shit!

>>2794362
that's all true

but also the statistics show that flying is very safe
everything you listed has an incredible low probability of happening

you're more likely to choke to death on regular food in a given year (even as 18yo to 50s)
than you are dying on one flight

it's all about relative risk
not what sound the most scary